Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 1;80(4):393–401. doi: 10.3109/17453670903039544

Table 2.

Characteristics of the total hip arthroplasty patients and operations registered in the NARA database, 1995–2006

Denmark Sweden Norway p-value a
No. of THAs 69,242 140,821 70,138
Male sex, % 41.7 39.8 30.2 < 0.001
Age groups, %
< 30 years 0.5 0.3 0.5
30–39 1.4 1.0 1.3
40–49 4.2 3.5 3.8
50–59 14.7 13.7 12.7
60–69 29.9 28.0 26.4
70–79 34.1 36.5 39.1
≥ 80 years 15.2 17.1 16.3 < 0.001
Diagnosis, %
Primary osteoarthritis 77.6 78.8 73.7
Inflammatory arthritis 2.4 3.6 3.3
Hip fracture 11.9 11.5 11.2
Childhood diseases 3.1 1.8 8.6
Idiopatic caput necrosis 2.8 2.9 1.3
Others 2.3 1.3 2.0 < 0.001
Fixation, %
Cemented 45.9 88.9 78.9
Uncemented 26.8 4.4 13.2
Hybrid 26.4 4.0 4.0
Inverse hybrid 0.6 2.2 3.8
Resurfacing 0.3 0.5 0.2 < 0.001
Approach, %
Posterior 91.0 60.3 23.8 < 0.001
Cause of revision, %
Aseptic loosening 34.8 50.4 47.3
Deep infection 15.8 15.0 15.5
Perioprostetic fracture 5.1 6.7 3.5
Dislocation 33.5 23.4 23.8
Pain only 3.0 0.8 2.3
Others 7.8 3.7 7.6 < 0.001
Procedure at revision, %
Total prosthesis replaced 16.4 28.4 21.6
Only stem replaced 20.7 24.8 27.5
Only cup replaced 43.7 29.6 32.9
Extraction of the total prosthesis 8.9 8.6 9.1
Others 10.3 8.6 8.9 < 0.001

a Chi-square test for differences between countries.