Table 1.
Performance of indel annotation tools compared by different measures (ICA, IRA, IAC) on five-species alignments.
| ICAa | IRAb | IACc (sensitivity) | IACc (specificity) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Indelign | sbInfer | Indelign | sbInfer | Indelign | sbInfer | Indelign | sbInfer |
| D. sim | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| D. mel | 0.04 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| D. yak | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| D. ana | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.96 |
| D. pse | 0.24 | 0.27 | 1.02 | 1.03 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
aIndel Count Agreement (optimal value = 0)
bIndel Ratio Agreement (optimal value = 1)
cIndel Annotation Coverage (optimal value = 1)