Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Dec 31;50(2):434–445. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.007

Table 4.

Summary of results of 12-month longitudinal atrophy estimation experiments using nine DBM configurations summarized in Equation (6). See caption to Table 2 for the meaning of the rows and columns. For each cell, the mean atrophy and standard deviation are given in the MCI and control groups, as well as the p-value of the MCI-control group comparison, and the sample size needed to detect 25% reduction in MCI atrophy relative to control atrophy with 80% power and significance level 0.05. Lower sample size indicates more powerful atrophy estimation.

RIGID
BL HW FU

NON-RIGID BL μ MCI: −0.07% 2.31% 3.56%
σ MCI: 2.50% 1.92% 1.84%
μ CTL: −1.88% 0.91% 2.58%
σ CTL: 1.64% 1.13% 1.55%
p -value: 4.52E-06 1.76E-06 1.89E-03
N: 482 474 892
CI 0.9 (N): 263–1230 265–1183 386–4287

HW μ MCI: 0.36% 2.04% 4.78%
σ MCI: 2.55% 1.91% 1.85%
μ CTL: −1.57% 0.69% 3.50%
σ CTL: 1.58% 1.10% 1.36%
p -value: 1.06E-06 3.18E-06 2.1E-05
N: 438 508 519
CI 0.9 (N): 240–1146 283–1280 272–1459

FU μ MCI: 0.93% 1.69% 5.80%
σ MCI: 2.35% 1.91% 1.80%
μ CTL: −0.96% 0.34% 4.42%
σ CTL: 1.48% 1.11% 1.19%
p -value: 3.05E-07 2.93E-06 1.32E-06
N: 391 499 426
CI 0.9 (N): 218–1025 279–1214 232–1047