Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Recognit. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):153–172. doi: 10.1002/jmr.973

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Illustration of the HSMD reconstruction process of conformation i of a peptide consisting of three glycine residues. At each step the transition probability (TP) of a dihedral angle and the successive bond angle is determined and the related atoms are then fixed in their positions in i. The figure describes step 4 where the dihedral and bond angles considered are φ2 (of the second residue) and the successive θ, respectively; these coordinates are also denoted α7 and α8, respectively (see text). In this process the already reconstructed part (the past) is depicted with solid lines and solid spheres (atoms); for simplicity the oxygens and most of the hydrogens are discarded. The TP is obtained by carrying out an MD simulation of the as yet unreconstructed part of the peptide (the future) which is depicted with dashed lines and empty spheres. In this simulation the “past” atoms remain fixed at their positions in i while the conformations of the future part should remain within the limits of the microstate; future-past interactions are taken into account. Small bins δφ2and δθ are centered at the values of φ2 and θ in i. The TP is calculated from the number of simultaneous visits of the future part to δφ2 and δθ during the simulation (see equation (42)). After TP(4) has been determined the coordinates of the two hydrogen atoms of Cα (2) and those of C’(2) are fixed at their positions in i and the process continues.