Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Recognit. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):153–172. doi: 10.1002/jmr.973

Table 4.

Differences in entropy, TΔSA (kcal/mol) between the extended, helical and hairpin microstates of (Gly)10 obtained by HSMDa

Unit=1500 n=400 Unit=500 n=400 Unit=2000 n=200 Flexible model
nf = 24000 nf = 6000 nf = 2000 nf = 1000 nf = 500 nf = 6000
T(Sextend - Shairpin) 2.9 (1) 2.9 (2) 2.9 (2) 2.9 (2) 2.9 (2) 2.8 (3) 3.0 (3)
T(Sextend - Shelix) 4.0 (1) 4.0 (1) 4.0 (1) 4.0 (1) 4.0 (1) 3.9 (2) 4.0 (3)
T(Shairpin -Shelix) 1.1 (1) 1.2 (1) 1.2 (1) 1.1 (1) 1.1 (1) 1.2 (1) 1.0 (2)
a

The simulations were carried out in vacuum at a low temperature, T=100 K - to keep the system in the three microstates (Cheluvaraja and Meirovitch, 2006). n is the size of the reconstructed MD sample; nf is the sample size of the future chains, nf =jn’f where n’f is the unit size. The statistical error is defined in Table 1. The table shows that the results for TΔSA are very stable i.e., they are equal (within the error bars) for a range of nf values between 24000 and 500. The results for nf=24000 are considered to be the correct results for TΔS. The HSMD results are very close to those obtained by Cheluvaraja and Meirovitch, 2004 using HSMC for the “flexible model” of (Gly)10 where the bond lengths are constant but the bond angles are allowed to change.