Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 4;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-1

Table 1.

SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL COMPARISONS

Inputs EVs in model Output/contrasts
STEP 1: ENCODE data n.a. ENCODE* data
ICA data review (Separate for each paradigm and subject) RECOG data RECOG* data
MATCH data MATCH* data
STEP 2: ENCODE* data EV1: route (or 3D) C11 = EV1-EV2
Subject paradigm analysis (Separate for each paradigm and subject) RECOG* data EV2: survey (or 2D) C12 = EV2-EV1
MATCH* data EV3: fixation C13 = (EV1+EV2)-2*EV3
EV4-9: motion parameters of no interest C14 = 2*EV3-(EV1+EV2)
STEP 3: C13 from each paradigm EV1: time1 > time2 C21 = EV1
Intra-subject analysis (Separate for each subject) EV2-4: paired t-test parameters of no interest C22 = -EV1
STEP 4: C21 from each subject EV1: ADT C31 = EV1
Group time1 vs. time2 analysis EV2: CTR C32 = -EV1
C33 = EV2
C34 = -EV2
C35 = EV1-EV2
C36 = EV2-EV1
STEP 5: C11 or C13 from each subject EV1: ADTtime1 > ADTtime2 C41 = EV1
Group paradigm analysis (Separate for each paradigm) EV2: CTRtime1 > CTRtime2 C42 = -EV1
EV3-14: paired t-test C43 = EV2
parameters of no interest C44 = -EV2
C45 = EV1-EV2
C46 = EV2-EV1
STEP 6: C13 from each subject n.a. n.a.
Determining average z-scores (Separate for each paradigm and subject)

Independent components analysis (ICA), explanatory variable (EV), contrast (C)