Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009319

Table 1. Values for aggressiveness during one-on-one confrontations between workers.

I Sites A B C D E F
F, H for Cr. ranavalonae 2.9 2.7 2.9 3.7 3.0 3.1
II Sites A B C D E F
A 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1
B 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.1
C 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2
D 1.3 1.1 1.0
E 1.1 1.1
F 1.1
III Sites F G H
F 1.1 3.7 3.3
G 1.0 3.2
H 1.0

(I) Interspecific confrontations between Technomyrmex albipes (colonies from areas A–F) and Cr. ranavalonae workers (from areas F, G). Areas A–E correspond to a total of ca. 8.4 km of shoreline, while area F is situated 1.7 km inland. Aggressiveness values were recorded only for T. albipes workers and calculated for cases where they initiated the encounters. Statistical comparisons (Kruskal–Wallis tests); T. albipes vs. Cr. ranavalonae: H5 60 = 9.5; P = 0.092. (II) Intraspecific aggressiveness between T. albipes workers; control lot or individuals from the same tree: H5 60 = 3.4; P = 0.80; experimental lot or individuals from two different areas: H14 150 = 13.2; P = 0.51. Comparison taking into account inter- and intraspecific confrontations: H2 150 = 1573.1; P<0.0001; Dunn's multiple comparison tests, T. albipes workers confronted with Cr. ranavalonae vs. T. albipes workers from the control or the experimental group: P<0.001 in both cases; confrontations between T. albipes workers (control vs. experimental lot): P>0.05. (III) Intraspecific aggressiveness between Cr. ranavalonae workers gathered from three different areas (F, G, H). Workers from the same area/colony were not aggressive with each other, while this was not the case for those from different areas. Statistical comparisons (Kruskal–Wallis tests): H5 60 = 49.46; P<0.0001; Dunn's multiple comparison tests, workers from the same area: P>0.05 in all cases; from two different areas: P<0.05; workers from same area vs. from two different areas (control vs. experimental lots): P<0.01.