Table 4.
Comparison of agreement between clinician’s assessment and the central laboratory’s expert assessment of aspiration across categories, by intervention.
Intervention |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Category | Chin Down | Nectar-thick | Honey-thick |
Overall Kappa | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
Gender * | |||
Female | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.82 |
Male | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
Age * | |||
55–79 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.90 |
80–95 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
Race * | |||
White | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
Non-white | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.88 |
Education * | |||
< HS Graduate | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.84 |
HS Graduate | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.87 |
Some college | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.88 |
Gastrostomy * | |||
No | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.87 |
Yes | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.84 |
Diagnosis * | |||
Parkinson’s disease | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.93 |
Dementia | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.81 |
Parkinson’s disease with dementia | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.87 |
Order of administration* | |||
First | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.90 |
Second | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
Third | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
There are no statistically significant associations (p-value > 0.05 for all).