Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dysphagia. 2008 Oct 25;24(2):211–217. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9196-6

Table 5.

Comparison of agreement between clinician’s assessment and the central laboratory’s expert assessment of Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores by intervention.

Level of agreement between
clinician and central laboratory
assessments of pen-asp score1
Exact Match Up to One Step
Difference2

Intervention, condition Clinician Assessment Patients N % N %
Chin-down, 3ml No penetration (1) 250 168 67 227 91
Penetration (2–5) 248 155 63 207 83
Aspiration (6–8) 231 178 77 194 84
Overall 729 501 69 628 86
Tau correlation 0.77
Nectar, 3ml No penetration 336 255 76 303 90
Penetration 217 132 61 178 82
Aspiration 182 125 69 139 76
Overall 735 512 70 620 84
Tau correlation 0.74
Honey, 3ml No penetration 422 336 80 367 87
Penetration 166 97 58 130 78
Aspiration 181 132 73 138 76
Overall 769 565 73 635 83
Tau correlation 0.73
Chin down, cup No penetration 161 110 68 149 93
Penetration 238 162 68 194 82
Aspiration 227 175 77 197 87
Overall 626 447 71 540 86
Tau correlation 0.81
Nectar, cup No penetration 180 139 77 158 88
Penetration 237 157 66 188 79
Aspiration 207 145 70 161 78
Overall 624 441 71 507 81
Tau correlation 0.76
Honey, cup No penetration 344 297 86 316 92
Penetration 163 97 60 126 77
Aspiration 201 152 76 161 80
Overall 708 546 76 603 85
Tau correlation 0.77
1

Agreement is based on the exact P/A scale value assigned by the clinician and the CL. E.g., a score of 3 by the clinician and 3 by the CL indicates exact agreement, whereas a score of 2 by the clinician and 3 by the CL indicates a difference of one on the P/A scale.

2

Includes all instances of exact match and all instances where the difference was exactly one step on the P/A scale