Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;46(2):314–321. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.054

Table 4.

Trabecular parameters analyzed by μCT in the proximal tibia of 21-week-old female C57BL/6 mice that received no artificial loading, static (2.0 N) loading or static (2.0 N) plus dynamic (11.5 N) loading in the right tibia/fibula for 2 weeks.

NOLOAD left NOLOAD right STATIC left STATIC right DYNAMIC + STATIC left DYNAMIC + STATIC right
0.010.25 mm
Percent bone volume (%) 15.2 ± 0.6 15.1 ± 0.6 14.3 ± 0.7 13.9 ± 0.7 13.9 ± 0.4 20.1 ± 1.1
Trabecular number (mm 1) 3.19 ± 0.12 3.27 ± 0.12 3.17 ± 0.15 3.15 ± 0.18 2.99 ± 0.14 3.53 ± 0.13
Trabecular thickness (μm) 47.6 ± 0.5 46.1 ± 0.5 45.2 ± 0.9 44.4 ± 0.4# 47.0 ± 1.4 56.9 ± 1.8



0.251.25 mm
Percent bone volume (%) 9.2 ± 0.2 9.7 ± 0.3 8.8 ± 0.3 8.9 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.3 13.9 ± 0.7
Trabecular number (mm 1) 1.70 ± 0.06 1.77 ± 0.07 1.68 ± 0.07 1.73 ± 0.07 1.63 ± 0.07 2.08 ± 0.10
Trabecular thickness (μm) 54.4 ± 0.5 54.8 ± 0.6 52.7 ± 0.7 51.4 ± 0.7 52.9 ± 1.5 66.8 ± 0.9

Mean ± SE (n = 7).

p < 0.05 versus left in the DYNAMIC + STATIC group by paired t-test. #p < 0.05 versus left in the NOLOAD group by one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett T3 test.