Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethics Behav. 2009 Nov 1;19(6):461–478. doi: 10.1080/10508420903274971

Table 3.

Professional Group Alpha Test: Evaluation of Course Modules by Topic (N=9)

Survey Topic Module
1
Module
2
Module
3
Module
4
Module
5
Topic
Ratings
across
Modules

M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD
This module is organized and
logical1
7.0 0.8 7.7 0.7 7.7 1.1 7.7 0.7 7.9 0.6 7.6 0.8

The purpose of this module is
clear1
8.1 0.6 8.1 0.6 8.2 0.7 7.7 1.0 8.1 0.6 8.0 0.7

This module’s topics are relevant to
the overall course1
8.0 0.9 8.6 0.5 8.8 0.4 8.6 0.5 8.2 0.7 8.4 0.6

Rating of the module on2:
▪ Accuracy of content 7.3 0.7 7.8 0.4 7.6 0.7 7.7 0.7 7.8 0.4 7.6 0.6
▪ Clear and concise language 7.8 0.8
7.6 0.9 7.7 0.7 7.4 0.5 7.8 0.7 7.7 0.7
▪ Depth of content 7.2 1.0 7.3 1.1 7.2 0.8 6.4 1.0 7.1 0.8 7.0 0.9
▪ Appropriateness of test
  complexity for audience
7.8 0.8 7.3 0.7 7.8 0.8 7.7 0.7 7.8 0.4 7.7 0.7
▪ Relevance of questions addressed 7.9 0.9 8.1 0.8 8.3 0.7 8.2 0.7 7.9 1.1 8.1 0.8

How well module content
addressed learning objectives2
▪ Learning Objective 1 7.1 0.9 7.1 1.2 7.4 1.5 7.3 0.9 7.7 0.7 7.3 1.0
▪ Learning Objective 2 8.0 0.9 8.6 0.5 7.6 1.6 7.0 0.9 7.3 0.9 7.7 1.0
▪ Learning Objective 3 7.9 0.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Module ratings across topics 7.6 0.8 7.8 0.7 7.8 0.9 7.5 0.8 7.8 0.7
1

Rated on a 9-point scale from 1 = “strongly disagree” to 9 = “strongly agree”

2

Rated on a 9-point scale from 1 = “very poor” to 9 = “excellent”