Table 3.

Evidence in Favor of the Hypothesis that Treatment A Is More Effective than Treatment B in Accelerating Emotional Healing

	Treatment A
	Women												Men
	Control			SC			CC			NC			Control			SC			CC			NC
	Mdna	BOb	pc	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p	Mdn	BO	p
Treatment B
Control
PG				−0.4	7.0	0.87	−0.2	3.1	0.76	−0.3	5.5	.85				0.005	0.97	0.49	−0.4	22.6	0.96	−0.4	20.2	0.95
GRE				−0.2	3.2	0.76	0.09	0.55	0.35	−0.1	2.4	0.70				0.2	0.27	0.22	−0.2	4.3	0.81	−0.1	2.3	0.69
CESD				−0.3	2.3	0.70	−0.1	1.5	0.60	−0.7	7.9	0.89				0.3	0.31	0.24	0.4	0.18	0.16	−0.05	1.2	0.54
SC
PG	0.4	0.15	0.13				0.1	0.54	0.35	0.05	0.79	0.44	−0.005	1.0	0.51				−0.4	18.7	0.95	−0.4	19.2	0.95
GRE	0.2	0.32	0.24				0.3	0.16	0.14	0.05	0.74	0.43	−0.2	3.5	0.78				−0.4	17.9	0.95	−0.3	8.0	0.89
CESD	0.3	0.43	0.30				0.1	0.69	0.41	−0.4	3.0	0.75	−0.3	3.2	0.76				0.1	0.67	0.40	−0.4	3.9	0.80
CC
PG	0.2	0.32	0.24	−0.1	1.9	0.65				−0.08	1.5	0.61	0.4	0.04	0.04	0.4	0.05	0.05				0.008	0.95	0.49
GRE	0.09	0.54	0.65	−0.3	6.1	0.86				−0.2	4.3	0.81	0.2	0.23	0.19	0.4	0.05	0.05				0.1	0.50	0.33
CESD	0.1	0.66	0.40	−0.1	1.4	0.59				−0.5	4.8	0.83	−0.4	5.3	0.84	−0.1	1.5	0.60				−0.5	6.6	0.87
NC
PG	0.3	0.18	0.15	−0.05	1.3	0.56	0.08	0.64	0.39				0.4	0.05	0.05	0.4	0.05	0.05	−0.008	1.0	0.51
GRE	0.1	0.43	0.30	−0.05	1.3	0.57	0.2	0.23	0.19				0.1	0.45	0.31	0.3	0.14	0.11	−0.1	2.0	0.67
CESD	0.7	0.14	0.11	0.4	0.33	0.25	0.5	0.20	0.17				0.05	0.85	0.46	0.4	0.25	0.20	0.5	0.15	0.13

^aMdn, median estimate of the difference in recovery slopes across the postbaseline measurement waves (effect size).

^bBO, Bayesian odds ratio. Using Jeffreys criterion,⁵⁶ evidence is substantial if BO ≥ 3.2 and strong if BO ≥ 10.

^cp, Probability that the slope of recovery due to treatment A is steeper (faster) than the slope of recovery to treatment B.