Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 11;54(3):1283–1289. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00970-09

TABLE 2.

Diagnostic accuracy at the codon level: results of initial and repeat hybridization compared to sequencing (Innogenetics internal validation)

Codon No. (%) of tests with indicated resulta
Full concordanceb
Partial concordance
IND on LiPA Complete discordance Total
Total WT MUT MIX MIX LiPA no MIX Seq MIX Seq no MIX LiPA Different MIX
L80V/I 44 39 3 2 31 0 0 0 2 77
V/G173L 70 70 0 0 12 0 0 2 0 84
L180M 57 31 21 5 28 1 0 0 0 86
A181T/V 72 68 1 3 12 1 1 0 0 86
M204V/I/S 50 16 34 0 30 1 3 1 1 86
N236T 83 82 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 86
Total 376 (74.5) 306 (60.6) 59 (11.7) 11 (2.2) 116 (23.0) 3 (0.6) 4 (0.8) 3 (0.6) 3 (0.6) 505 (100)
a

WT, wild type; MUT, mutant; MIX, wild type and mutant both present with respect to codons 80, 173, 180, 181, 204, and 236; Mix LiPA no MIX Seq, detection of both wild type and mutant by LiPA versus either wild type or mutant detected by sequencing; MIX Seq no MIX LiPA, detection of both wild type and mutant by sequencing versus either wild type or mutant detected by LiPA; Different MIX, different mixture between LiPA and sequencing of both wild type and mutant present with at least one shared amino acid by both methods; IND on LiPA, indeterminate result with LiPA.

b

The data for full concordance between LiPA and direct sequencing are divided into three groups: the WT group, MUT group, and MIX group.