Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 30;21(3):608–614. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp479

Table 3.

Effects of Medical Qigong (intention-to-treat analysis using multiply imputed data) within- and between-group differences

Variables Within group (week 10–week 0)
Between groups (intervention and control)
Mean difference from baseline (95% CI), independent samples t-test
Mean difference between groups (95% CI), independent samples t-test Regression statistics
Medical Qigong group (n = 79) Control group (n = 83) t value df P values
QOL measured by FACT-Ga
    Physical well-being 3.06 (1.97 to 4.14) 0.98 (0.04 to 1.91) 2.08 (0.66 to 3.50) −3.720 152 <0.001
    Social well-being 2.29 (1.25 to 3.32) −0.97 (−2.00 to 0.06) 3.26 (1.81 to 4.71) −4.663 148 <0.001
    Emotional well-being 1.60 (0.86 to 2.35) 0.05 (−0.75 to 0.85) 1.55 (0.47 to 2.63) −3.677 150 <0.001
    Functional well-being 2.46 (1.51 to 3.42) −0.13 (−0.94 to 0.68) 2.60 (1.35 to 3.84) −4.467 151 <0.001
    Total QOL 8.86 (6.41 to 11.32) −0.13 (−2.48 to 2.22) 9.00 (5.62 to 12.36) −5.761 144 <0.001
Fatigue measured by FACT-Fa
    Fatigue 6.34 (4.38 to 8.30) 0.64 (−0.74 to 2.02) 5.70 (3.32 to 8.09) −5.621 153 <0.001
Mood status measured by POMSb
    Tension and anxietyc −1.71 (−2.94 to −0.48) −0.47 (−1.84 to 0.90) −1.24 (−3.06 to 0.58) 2.239 136 0.027
    Depressionc −1.01 (−2.62 to 0.59) 1.54 (−0.52 to 3.61) −2.56 (−5.14 to 0.01) 2.215 108 0.029
    Anger and hostilityc −0.05 (−1.30 to 1.21) −0.30 (−1.83 to 1.24) 0.25 (−1.71 to 2.20) 1.359 104 0.177
    Lack of vigorc −3.81 (−4.91 to −2.72) 0.53 (−0.65 to 1.71) −4.34 (−5.93 to −2.75) 4.839 139 <0.001
    Fatiguec −2.42 (−3.79 to −1.05) −1.30 (−2.63 to 0.03) −1.12 (−3.01 to 0.77) 2.632 126 0.010
    Confusionc −0.76 (−1.68 to 1.17) 0.11 (−0.90 to 1.12) −0.87 (−2.23 to 0.49) 1.929 137 0.056
    Total mood status −8.73 (−14.62 to −2.84) 1.91 (−5.25 to 9.07) −10.64 (−19.81 to −1.47) 2.346 122 0.021
Inflammation biomarkerb
    C-reactive protein (mg/l)c −3.60 (−9.03 to 1.82) 19.57 (5.37 to 33.76) −23.17 (−37.08 to −9.26) 2.042 99 0.044
a

Higher scores reflect positive effect of intervention.

b

Lower scores reflect positive effect of intervention.

c

Logarithmic transformations were used in the model.

CI, confidence interval; FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General; QOL, quality of life; FACT-F, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Fatigue; POMS, Profile of Mood State.