Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 25;37(2):771–783. doi: 10.1118/1.3284530

Table 5.

Comparative results for the liver segmentation (in alphabetical order of authors). Columns present the DC, VO, VER, RMSE, and ASD.

  DC (%) VO (%) VER (%) RMSE (mm) ASD (mm)
Our method 96.2±0.6 92.7±1.1 2.2±2.1 2.3±0.5 1.2±0.2
Campadelli et al.a 95.2±1.2 N∕A N∕A N∕A N∕A
Florin et al.b 91.6 N∕A >3 >3.5 3
Freiman et al.c N∕A 91.4 2.7 2.9 1.4
Heimann et al.d 94.9±1.4 N∕A N∕A 3.3±1.2 1.6±0.5
Kainmüller et al.e N∕A 93 3.6 2.3 1.1
Ling et al.f N∕A N∕A N∕A N∕A 1.5±0.5
Massoptier and Casciarog 94.2±1.1 N∕A N∕A N∕A 3.7±1.8
Okada et al.h N∕A 89.2±1.4 N∕A N∕A 1.3±0.2
Rusko et al.i N∕A 89.3 4.3 3.8 1.8
Schmidt et al.j N∕A 83.8 5 5.4 2.8
Soler et al.k N∕A N∕A N∕A N∕A 2
a

Reference 32.

b

Reference 24.

c

Reference 27.

d

Reference 26.

e

Reference 62.

f

Reference 28.

g

Reference 29.

h

Reference 31.

i

Reference 63.

j

Reference 64.

k

Reference 29.