Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Cybern. 2004 Sep 16;91(4):231–242. doi: 10.1007/s00422-004-0506-2

Fig. 9a, b.

Fig. 9a, b

a RMS between experimental Fn and optimized Fn* as a function of the operative friction coefficient (μop – see text). The cost function used was f2 with i0 = 2. The dotted vertical lines show the μop values for which different digits have a minimum RMS. These minimum μop values range from 0.33 for the R finger to 0.7 for the L finger. b Optimization results for μop = 0.4 and experimental data