Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine (Lond). 2009 Oct;4(7):813–845. doi: 10.2217/nnm.09.59

Table 7.

Comparison of the features of two optical scattering methods for sensing photothermal bubbles.

Detection method Pros Cons
Time-resolved image mode High sensitivity Requires precise focusing due to small size of PTB
Shows 2D location of the PTB Saturates when PTB size reaches some threshold
Pixel image amplitude is PTB size-dependent
Pixel image amplitude can be amplified by increasing
pulse fluence

Response mode Allows detection of the PTB in 3D volume regardless Relatively low sensitivity
of its specific position Signal duration slightly depends upon the number
Signal duration is PTB size-dependent of the PTBs in the aperture of the probe beam
Does not saturate when PTB size reaches
some threshold
Allows detection of other PT phenomena such as
heating of the bulk media

PT: Photothermal; PTB: Photothermal bubble.