Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov-Dec;62(6):448–456. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v62i6.842

Table 3.

Protocol Violations

Violations and Effects 2006 Standard Protocol (n = 50) 2006 Lower Target Protocol (n = 50) 1996 Study1 (n = 50)
No protocol violations (no. and % of patients) 34 (68) 37 (74) 18 (36)

Protocol violations (no. and % of violations)
Total number of violations 20 18 49
Incorrect adjustment of infusion rate 7 (35) 5 (28) 18 (37)
Incorrect sampling time for initial PTT 3 (15) 7 (39) 24 (49)*
Incorrect bolus dose 3 (15) 0 3 (6)
Incorrect infusion hold time 3 (15) 1 (6) NA
Omission of documentation of PTT 2 (10) 0 NA
Omission of PTT test(s) 1 (5) 4 (22) 4 (8)
Physician not notified 1 (5) 1 (6) 0

Effect on primary outcomes (median and range)
Time to PTT > lower limit of therapeutic range (h)
For patients with no protocol violation 6.0 (4.0–26.5) 6.3 (4.8–14.3) NA
For patients with at least 1 protocol violation 6.0 (4.0–40.8) 11.1 (5.5–53.0) NA
Time to PTT within therapeutic range (h)
For patients with no protocol violation 12.8 (4.0–55.0)§ 14.0 (4.5–36.8) NA
For patients with at least 1 protocol violation 22.0 (5.5–40.8)§ 20.3 (6.0–53.0) NA

NA = not applicable, PTT = partial thromboplastin time.

*

For 1996 study, this value refers to incorrect sampling time for any PTT.

p = 0.59, for comparison between group with no protocol violations and group with at least 1 protocol violation.

p = 0.04, for comparison between group with no protocol violations and group with at least 1 protocol violation

§

p = 0.017, for comparison between group with no protocol violations and group with at least 1 protocol violation

p = 0.08, for comparison between group with no protocol violations and group with at least 1 protocol violation.