Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Mot Behav. 2007 Jul;39(4):276–290. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.39.4.276-290

TABLE 2.

Example of the Categorization for the Index Finger

Friction at the
index finger contact
No. of other fingers at low friction contact
0 1 2 3
High friction at the thumb contact
H HHHHH HHLHH HHLLH HHLLL
HHHLH HHHLL
HHHHL HHLHL
L HLHHH HLLHH HLLLH HLLLL
HLHLH HLHLL
HLHHL HLLHL

Low friction at the thumb contact
H LHHHH LHLHH LHLLH LHLLL
LHHLH LHHLL
LHHHL LHLHL
L LLHHH LLLHH LLLLH LLLLL
LLHLH LLHLL
LLHHL LLLHL

Note. The data of 32 surface conditions for each finger were categorized by (a) surface at the thumb contact (high-friction contact [H] or low-friction contact [L]), (b) surface at the finger contact (H or L), and (c) number of other fingers at low-friction contact (from 0 to 3)—in total 16 groups. The groups are presented in the individual cells in the four right-hand columns of the table. For instance, the comparison was performed for the groups HHLHH, HHHLH, HHHHL and for the groups HLLHH, HLHLH, HLHHL. Similar categorizations and similar analyses were performed for the middle, ring, and little fingers.