TABLE 2.
Friction at the index finger contact |
No. of other fingers at low friction contact |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
High friction at the thumb contact | ||||
H | HHHHH | HHLHH | HHLLH | HHLLL |
HHHLH | HHHLL | |||
HHHHL | HHLHL | |||
L | HLHHH | HLLHH | HLLLH | HLLLL |
HLHLH | HLHLL | |||
HLHHL | HLLHL | |||
Low friction at the thumb contact | ||||
H | LHHHH | LHLHH | LHLLH | LHLLL |
LHHLH | LHHLL | |||
LHHHL | LHLHL | |||
L | LLHHH | LLLHH | LLLLH | LLLLL |
LLHLH | LLHLL | |||
LLHHL | LLLHL |
Note. The data of 32 surface conditions for each finger were categorized by (a) surface at the thumb contact (high-friction contact [H] or low-friction contact [L]), (b) surface at the finger contact (H or L), and (c) number of other fingers at low-friction contact (from 0 to 3)—in total 16 groups. The groups are presented in the individual cells in the four right-hand columns of the table. For instance, the comparison was performed for the groups HHLHH, HHHLH, HHHHL and for the groups HLLHH, HLHLH, HLHHL. Similar categorizations and similar analyses were performed for the middle, ring, and little fingers.