Skip to main content
. 1999 Nov 6;319(7219):1230–1234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1230

Table 4.

Number of districts in which universal screening would be cost effective compared with selective screening according to rates of uptake of testing, pretest discussion time, and test costs and assuming willingness to pay £10 000 per additional life year gained

Length of pretest discussion (min) No of districts
Test costs in London (16 districts)
Test costs outside London (102 districts)
£2.70 £15.00 £0.60 £2.70
Universal uptake 95%, selective uptake 20%
0 16 14 102 72
1 16 13 102 71
2 16 13 100 61
4 16 13 95 50
6 16 13 82 39
Universal uptake 95%, selective uptake 60%
0 16 13 102 35
1 16 13 102 27
2 16 13 100 22
4 16 13 80 17
6 16 12 55 14
Universal uptake 50%, selective uptake 20%
0 16 13 102 61
1 16 13 100 47
2 16 13 92 37
4 16 13 66 21
6 16 13 38 17
Universal uptake 50%, selective uptake 60%
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0