Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47(Suppl 3):S249–S265.

Table 3.

Historical mortality rates among patients with pneumonia, according to age or baseline status of the severity of their condition.

Mortality among patients
aged <30 years
or with “good” statusa
Mortality among patients
aged 30–59 years
or with “fair” statusa
Mortality among patients
aged ≥60 years
or with “poor” statusa



Study No antibiotics Antibiotic
treatment
Absolute
reductionb
(95% CI), %
No antibiotics Antibiotic
treatment
Absolute
reductionb
(95% CI), %
No antibiotics Antibiotic
treatment
Absolute
reductionb
(95% CI), %
Tilghman and Finland [37] 32/301 (11) NA 154/563 (27) NA 96/140 (69) NA

Bullowa [38] 103/739 (14) NA 371/1090 (34) NA 80/135 (59) NA

Heinztelman et al. [28] NA NA 5/7 (71) 0/7 (0) 3/3 (100) 2/2 (100)

Evans and Gaisford [31] 6/34 (18) 1/51 (2) 18/52 (35) 6/44 (14) 3/4 (75) 1/5 (20)

Dowling and Lepper [26] 23/287 (8) 3/226 (1) 199/613 (32) 24/565 (4) 109/187 (58) 20/129 (16)

    Weighted average 164/1361 (12) 4/277 (1) 11 (8–13) 747/2325 (32) 30/616 (5) 27 (25–30) 291/469 (62) 23/136 (17) 45 (39–54)

NOTE. Data are no. of patients who died/total no. of patients (%), unless otherwise indicated. NA, not available.

a

Some studies scored the baseline status of the severity of illness as “good” (i.e., pneumonia severity index [PSI] classes II–III equivalent), “fair” (i.e., PSI classes III–IV equivalent), or “poor” (i.e., PSI classes IV–V equivalent); if scoring was not available, age was used.

b

The reduction in mortality is summarized across the studies as the difference between the group receiving antibiotics and the group not receiving antibiotics, weighted by the numbers of patients. The 95% CIs were calculated using standard linear combination variance formulas [35]. This method allows inclusion of 1-arm studies and nonrandomized 2-arm studies, which is not possible with meta-analytic techniques [36]. One small trial (by Heinzelman et al. [28]; n = 19) was not included in the summary statistics because of the 0% and 100% mortality rates among some subgroups. Also, the large, historical control study by Finland [25] was not included, because he reported only the percentage mortality according to age and did not list the numerator and denominator of patients in each age group.