Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2009 Aug 14;182(4):1350–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.070

Table 4. Determination of sensitivity and specificity of HA and HYAL-1 staining inferences for predicting biochemical recurrence.

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for HA and HYAL-1 staining inferences in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens were calculated using the cut-off limits determined from the ROC curves and then cross-validated. The data presented in the parentheses are mean values and 95% CI, derived from the cross validation analyses.

Parameter Area Under the Curve Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
HA (Biopsy) 0.77 72.7% (71.5%; 95% CI: 60.5 – 76.5) 63.7% (63.9%; 95% CI: 60.4 – 72.2) 68.2% (67.7%; 95% CI: 62.9 – 75.3)
HA (prostatectomy) 0.79 90.9% (85.8%; 95% CI: 80.6 – 93.5) 55.2% (56.3%; 95% CI: 51.7 – 63.8) 73% (71.8%; 95% CI: 67.6 – 77.4)
HYAL-1 (Biopsy) 0.87 81.8% (82.3%; 95% CI: 76.6 – 92.3) 81.8% (81.9%; 95% CI: 76.3 – 86.8) 81.8% (81.4%; 95% CI: 76.9 – 88.4)
HYAL-1 (prostatectomy) 0.95 90.9% (88.9%; 95% CI: (81.3 – 95.6) 75% (76.6%: 95% CI: 72.3 – 81.4) 83% (82.6%; 95% CI: 77.1 – 87.5)