Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Jan;33(1):5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.007

Table 1.

Baseline participant characteristics*

SMT 8 visits SMT 16 visits LM 8 visits LM 16 visits All
(n = 20) (n = 20) (n = 20) (n = 20) (n = 80)
Sociodemographic information
 Age (years) 38 ± 10 35 ± 12 37 ± 13 34 ± 10 36 ± 11
 Gender (female) 80% 80% 75% 85% 80%
Cervicogenic headaches
 Pain intensity (100-point scale) 51.2 ± 17.7 50.7 ± 16.8 56.8 ± 15.8 58.7 ± 17.1 54.3 ± 16.9
 Number of headaches in the past 4 weeks 14.8 ± 8.4 16.0 ± 7.7 15.8 ± 8.7 16.2 ± 7.0 15.7 ± 7.9
Health status
 Migraine sufferer (self report) 6 (30%) 6 (30%) 5 (25%) 5 (25%) 22 (28%)
Optimal number of treatments (4 – 20)
 SMT 12.4 ± 4.8 13.4 ± 5.1 11.6 ± 5.3 13.4 ± 4.7 12.7 ± 5.0
 LM 14.4 ± 5.1 14.2 ± 4.6 13.2 ± 5.5 15.2 ± 5.1 14.3 ± 5.0
Expectations
 Confidence in success of my treatment 4.4 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.1 4.0 ± 1.1 4.2 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 1.2
 Confidence in success of SMT 4.4 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.1 4.0 ± 1.5 4.2 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 1.3
 Confidence in success of LM 4.1 ± 1.1 4.0 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.1 4.2 ± 1.3 4.1 ± 1.2
Initial patient-provider encounter
 DC comfortable treating headache pain 4.8 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.4 4.5 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.4 4.7 ± 0.5
 DC enthusiastic about treatment 4.6 ± 0.7 4.7 ± 0.5 4.3 ± 0.9 4.3 ± 1.1 4.5 ± 0.8
 DC spent adequate time listening 4.5 ± 0.8 4.3 ± 1.0 4.7 ± 0.6 4.3 ± 1.1 4.4 ± 0.9
 DC confident in treatment success 4.3 ± 0.9 4.4 ± 0.8 3.3 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 1.3 3.8 ± 1.0

SMT, spinal manipulative therapy; LM, light massage.

*

Values are means ± SD or number (%).

6-point Likert scale anchored by 1 extremely uncertain and 6 extremely certain.

5-point Likert scale with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree. These were reported 2 weeks after enrollment.