Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 21;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-4

Table 1.

AUC's for the three test runs with their respective 95% CI and Dunn-Sidak corrected p-values as statistical difference in comparison with the ESN performance: ESN as reference (ref.) algorithm.

AUC 95% CI AUC p-value (ESN = ref.)
Testrun 1
ESN 0.822 0.778-0.865
SVM 0.831 0.786-0.875 0.238
NB 0.850 0.811-0.890 0.134
Testrun 2
ESN 0.818 0.773-0.864
SVM 0.833 0.784-0.881 0.356
NB 0.856 0.817-0.894 0.048
Testrun 3
ESN 0.817 0.774-0.861
SVM 0.833 0.789-0.876 0.093
NB 0.855 0.817-0.894 0.018