Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2009 Sep 9;57(1):12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.013

Table 2.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patient groups in the study cohort

No Recurrence Recurrence
Group 1 (n = 16) Without progression Group 2 (n = 16) With progression Group 3 (n = 16) p value
Gender (%) 0.025a
 Female 1 (6) 7 (44) 7 (44)
 Male 15 (94) 9 (56) 9 (56)
Median age, yr (range) 66.5 (29–83) 64.5 (39–76) 67 (62–86) 0.38b
Tumor grade (%) 0.47a
 G2 14 (88) 15 (94) 12 (75)
 G3 2 (12) 1 (6) 4 (25)
Multifocality (%) 0.11a
 Multifocal 1 (6) 0 (0) 4 (25)
 Single tumor 15 (94) 16 (100) 12 (75)
Median follow-up, yr (range) 7.9 (5.1–12.0) 8.0 (5.5–12.5) 5.7 (0.9–10.0) 0.017b
Median no. of recurrences before progression (range) 4 (1–9) 2.5 (0–7) 0.035b
Median time to first clinically significant event, mo* (95% CI) 11.3 (8.6–43.8) 7.4 (4.2–12.1) 0.012c
Clinical probability of recurrence§ (%)
 Intermediate 16 (100) 16 (100) 16 (100)
Clinical probability of progression§ (%) 0.051a
 Low 13 (81) 15 (94) 9 (56)
 Intermediate to high 3 (19) 1 (6) 7 (44)
*

Event is recurrence for group 2, and recurrence or progression (whichever occurred first) for group 3.

§

Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Ta T1 bladder cancer risk tables [4].

a

Fisher exact test.

b

Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

c

Log-rank test.

Except for a higher proportion of males in group 1, all groups had comparable demographic and pathologic features.