Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov 17;48(4):909–920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.010

Table 8.

Interference scores for each patient, grouped by test version (phonological, semantic) and condition (Related-1, Related-2, Related-3), for NO trials only. Boxes denote scores that were ≥ 2SD (shaded) relative to the control mean. Weaker STM denotes the lower of the two composite scores (see text).

Weaker Phonological Interference Semantic Interference

Subject STM Related-1 Related-2 Related-3 Related-1 Related-2 Related-3
BAC P 20.0 25.3 10.6 −2.5 6.8 −1.3
CAC S −4.0 −7.0 −3.8 7.6 0.4 1.8
CN S 16.2 8.5 2.4 33.6 14.5 7.6
DU P 7.7 −3.8 −8.6 21.7 −2.2 −0.7
EAC S −6.1 −4.3 7.4 9.4 0.2 −5.0
EBC S 0.2 1.6 1.0 −0.1 1.1 0.3
EP P 11.6 31.6 −1.7 10.6 3.7 2.2
IG P 14.6 1.0 1.8 31.8 10.9 −15.2
KBE S −7.9 17.1 −4.5 17.8 0.4 1.9
KCX S 4.8 8.4 0.4 0.6 −1.0 −1.9
KD S 21.3 −9.7 2.2 5.6 15.4 6.0
KL P 0.8 −3.5 3.7 2.7 6.9 9.6
MD S 0.6 −8.5 −8.6 −0.8 8.7 9.5
MH P 4.9 −5.2 4.0 −0.1 5.6 −4.0
NCC S −4.0 11.2 8.6 4.3 −0.1 −7.0
NH P 13.8 42.1 −13.0 −0.6 −3.7 11.1
NU P 4.5 1.1 1.5 1.5 0.4 −2.9
OE P 24.3 23.7 7.7 1.0 14.0 −8.8
TB S 5.8 1.1 6.2 15.9 4.4 13.9
XAI S 1.3 4.2 −3.6 20.1 7.6 −0.2

Ctrl Mn 6.3 4.2 1.7 4.0 3.3 0.5
Ctrl SD 6.1 6.4 4.4 6.9 6.4 3.8