Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2009 Jun 6;45(3):517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.026

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Percentage of new bone area (A) and residual scaffold (B) assessed in each group using histomorphometry. The quantity of newly formed bone for bMSCs/mSS group was much higher than that in the bMSCs/SS group (p<0.01) and no significant difference was found as compared with the autograft group (p>0.05). The percentage of residual scaffold was less in the bMSCs/mSS group than that in the bMSCs/SS group (p<0.05), and less in scaffold alone groups than that in cell-loaded groups (p<0.05).