Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 1;60(572):e98–e104. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483508

Table 2.

Between-group comparisons of patient satisfaction for all conditions.

Areas Statements Intervention median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score) Control median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score) Difference (intervention — control) in mean transformed satisfaction score (95% CI) P-value
Collection process I would rather have blood taken by a finger prick than by needle in my arm 7.8 (0.92) 5.1 (1.64) −0.73 (−0.89 to −0.57) <0.001

Confidence in the process Laboratories have better hygiene than point-of-care testing 4.3 (1.65) 4.6 (2.07) −0.43 (−0.62 to −0.23) <0.001

Confidence in the results I have confidence in the information given by my GP or practice regarding my pathology test result 9.0 (0.06) 8.9 (0.18) −0.12 (−0.21 to −0.03) 0.010

Convenience Not having to travel to an outside laboratory would be convenient 8.9 (0.17) 8.7 (0.36) −0.20 (−0.34 to −0.05) 0.009

Cost Outside pathology laboratories involves extra time and transport costs 8.5 (0.44) 8.6 (0.39) 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) 0.510

Disease management Having immediate feedback of the test result for my condition was important as it allowed/would allow me to discuss the management of my condition with my GP 9.0 (0.12) 8.7 (0.30) −0.18 (−0.30 to −0.06) 0.003

I am/would be more motivated to look after my condition because of regular point-of-care testing 8.9 (0.29) 8.2 (0.64) −0.36 (−0.49 to −0.22) <0.001

Point-of care-testing strengthened/would strengthen my relationship with my GP 8.3 (0.52) 8.1 (0.72) −0.20 (−0.35 to −0.05) 0.010

Note: a lower transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement except for the hypothesis relating to confidence in the process, where a higher transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement.