Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 1;60(572):e98–e104. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483508

Table 3.

Between-group comparisons of patient satisfaction by condition.

Areas Statements Patient conditions/group Intervention median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score) Control median satisfaction score (mean transformed satisfaction score) Difference (intervention — control) in mean transformed satisfaction score (95% CI) P-value
Collection process I would rather have blood taken by a finger prick than by needle in my arm All conditions 7.8 (0.92) 5.1 (1.64) −0.73 (−0.89 to −0.57) <0.001
Anticoagulant therapy 8.7 (0.36) 5.0 (1.60) −1.24 (−1.49 to −0.98) <0.001
Diabetes 7.8 (0.87) 5.9 (1.46) −0.59 (−0.80 to −0.39) <0.001
Hyperlipidaemia 7.7 (0.98) 5.0 (1.68) −0.70 (−0.87 to −0.53) <0.001

Confidence in the process Laboratories have better hygiene than point-of-care testing All conditions 4.3 (1.65) 4.6 (2.07) −0.43 (−0.62 to −0.23) <0.001
Anticoagulant therapy 3.4 (1.41) 4.8 (2.00) −0.59 (−0.87 to −0.30) <0.001
Diabetes 4.3 (1.71) 4.6 (2.09) −0.39 (−0.67 to −0.11) 0.007
Hyperlipidaemia 4.3 (1.66) 4.7 (2.09) −0.43 (−0.63 to −0.23) <0.001

Confidence in the results I have confidence in the information given by my GP or practice regarding my pathology test result All conditions 9.0 (0.06) 8.9 (0.18) −0.12 (−0.21 to −0.03) 0.010
Anticoagulant therapy 9.1 (−0.05) 8.9 (0.12) −0.16 (−0.32 to −0.01) 0.039
Diabetes 9.1 (−0.01) 8.9 (0.18) −0.18 (−0.32 to −0.04) 0.010
Hyperlipidaemia 8.9 (0.08) 8.9 (0.20) −0.12 (−0.21 to −0.02) 0.018

Convenience Not having to travel to an outside laboratory would be convenient All conditions 8.9 (0.17) 8.7 (0.36) −0.20 (−0.34 to −0.05) 0.009
Anticoagulant therapy 9.0 (0.04) 8.7 (0.37) −0.33 (−0.58 to −0.07) 0.012
Diabetes 8.9 (0.14) 8.8 (0.33) −0.19 (−0.36 to −0.01) 0.033
Hyperlipidaemia 8.8 (0.20) 8.5 (0.38) −0.18 (−0.34 to −0.03) 0.021

Cost Outside pathology laboratories involves extra time and transport costs All conditions 8.5 (0.44) 8.6 (0.39) 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) 0.51
Anticoagulant therapy 8.7 (0.38) 8.8 (0.42) −0.04 (−0.33 to 0.24) 0.76
Diabetes 8.5 (0.41) 8.6 (0.35) 0.06 (−0.13 to 0.26) 0.54
Hyperlipidaemia 8.4 (0.46) 8.5 (0.41) 0.05 (−0.12 to 0.22) 0.56

Disease management Having immediate feedback of the test result for my condition was important as it allowed/would allow me to discuss the management of my condition with my GP All conditions 9.0 (0.12) 8.7 (0.30) −0.18 (−0.30 to −0.06) 0.003
Anticoagulant therapy 9.2 (−0.10) 9.0 (0.27) −0.37 (−0.59 to −0.15) <0.001
Diabetes 9.1 (−0.00) 8.8 (0.25) −0.26 (0.41 to −0.11) <0.001
Hyperlipidaemia 9.0 (0.17) 8.6 (0.34) −0.17 (−0.29 to −0.05) 0.006

I am/would be more motivated to look after my condition because of regular point-of-care testing All conditions 8.9 (0.29) 8.2 (0.64) −0.36 (−0.49 to −0.22) <0.001
Anticoagulant therapy 9.1 (0.11) 8.6 (0.59) −0.48 (−0.70 to −0.25) <0.001
Diabetes 9.0 (0.22) 8.2 (0.59) −0.37 (−0.55 to −0.20) <0.001
Hyperlipidaemia 8.9 (0.32) 8.2 (0.66) −0.34 (−0.49 to −0.19) <0.001

Point-of-care testing strengthened/would strengthen my relationship with my GP All conditions 8.3 (0.52) 8.1 (0.72) −0.20 (−0.35 to −0.05) 0.010
Anticoagulant therapy 8.7 (0.37) 8.4 (0.65) −0.28 (−0.52 to −0.04) 0.024
Diabetes 8.7 (0.41) 8.3 (0.66) −0.25 (−0.43 to −0.06) 0.010
Hyperlipidaemia 8.3 (0.55) 8.0 (0.75) −0.20 (−0.35 to −0.05) 0.008

Note: a lower transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement except for the hypothesis relating to confidence in the process, where a higher transformed score indicates a higher level of agreement.