. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Basic Res Cardiol. 2010 Jan;105(1):129–137. doi: 10.1007/s00395-009-0056-9

Table 2.

Infarct size data

	n	Body weight (kg)	Heart weight (g)	Risk zone volume (cm³)	Infarct volume (cm³)	I/R (%)
Control	6	2.3 ± 0.1	7.2 ± 0.2	1.24 ± 0.06	0.47 ± 0.03	38.0 ± 2.1
AMP579	4	2.5 ± 0.0	8.5 ± 0.2	1.22 ± 0.13	0.16 ± 0.04^*	12.9 ± 2.2^*
PSB1115	4	2.4 ± 0.0	7.8 ± 0.4	1.48 ± 0.10	0.49 ± 0.05	32.6 ± 1.8
NECA	4	2.4 ± 0.2	7.5 ± 0.4	1.45 ± 0.10	0.21 ± 0.05^*	14.3 ± 0.3^*
AMP579 + PSB1115	6	2.5 ± 0.1	8.1 ± 0.2	1.47 ± 0.18	0.49 ± 0.09	32.2 ± 3.1
NECA + PSB1115	6	2.5 ± 0.0	8.5 ± 0.2	1.43 ± 0.14	0.55 ± 0.07	38.7 ± 2.4

Values are mean ± SEM

see Table 1; I/R infarction as a percentage of risk zone, n number of animals

Statistical significance of difference between experimental and control groups:

P < 0.05