Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 27;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-8

Table 3.

Cycling uptake in the intervention and comparison areas at the baseline and follow-up survey (n = 909)

Baseline Follow-up
Characteristic Intervention
(n = 520)
Comparison
(n = 389)
Total Intervention
(n = 520)
Comparison
(n = 389)
Total
% % % % % %
HAS A BICYCLE TO USE
Yes 32.7 25.4 29.6 44.2* 32.1 39.1
RIDER STATUS
Rode today 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.2
Last week 4.7 2.8 3.9 4.4 4.9 6.6
Last month 5.6 5.6 5.6 6.7 3.9 5.5
Last year 13.3 8.7 11.4 12.1 10.0 11.1
Longer than a year 65.0 67.5 66.1 62.5 64.3 63.3
Never 10.4 14.9 12.3 12.7 16.2 14.2
Cycled in last year 25.8 19.4 25.2 19.3
PHYSICALLY ACTIVE
Yes 44.9 47.7 46.1 48.7 53.7 50.8
SELF-RATE HEALTH
Excellent 13.3 16.5 14.6 11.4 12.9 12.0
Good 52.7 49.1 51.2 48.9 50.8 49.7
Fair 27.7 24.7 26.4 30.4 28.9 29.7
Poor 6.4 9.8 7.8 9.4 7.5 8.6
SEEN ADVERTISING ABOUT CYCLING
Yes 12.8 14.4 13.5 17.5 14.9 16.4
USED CYCLE PATH
Yes 22.9 * 15.9 19.9 28.3* 16.2 23.1
WANTS TO RIDE MORE
Yes 69.6 65.1 67.6 62.4* 55.6 59.6

* p < 0.05