Table 2.
Log-likelihood-ratio scoring matrices
|
Gg/Hs Rfam 70% identity, 54% A+T |
Tr/Hs Rfam 66% identity, 53% A+T |
At/Os Rfam 69% identity, 55% A+T |
||||||||||||
| a | c | g | t | a | c | g | t | a | c | g | t | |||
| a | 86 | -110 | -48 | -94 | a | 87 | -93 | -49 | -79 | a | 79 | -92 | -57 | -69 |
| c | -110 | 100 | -118 | -48 | c | -93 | 100 | -107 | -49 | c | -92 | 100 | -117 | -57 |
| g | -48 | -118 | 100 | -110 | g | -49 | -107 | 100 | -93 | g | -57 | -117 | 100 | -92 |
| t | -94 | -48 | -110 | 86 | t | -79 | -49 | -93 | 87 | t | -69 | -57 | -92 | 79 |
|
Gg/Hs TreeFam 65% identity, 49% A+T |
Tr/Hs TreeFam 57% identity, 46% A+T |
Sc/Sp TreeFam 49% identity, 60% A+T |
||||||||||||
| a | c | g | t | a | c | g | t | a | c | g | t | |||
| a | 100 | -99 | -46 | -113 | a | 100 | -75 | -38 | -92 | a | 71 | -55 | -28 | -60 |
| c | -99 | 92 | -82 | -46 | c | -75 | 82 | -63 | -38 | c | -55 | 100 | -58 | -28 |
| g | -46 | -82 | 92 | -99 | g | -38 | -63 | 82 | -75 | g | -28 | -58 | 100 | -55 |
| t | -113 | -46 | -99 | 100 | t | -92 | -38 | -75 | 100 | t | -60 | -28 | -55 | 71 |
Scoring matrices derived from Rfam (top row) or TreeFam (bottom row) based gold standards for the indicated genome pairs are shown. Species names abbreviated as: Gg: G. gallus, Hs: H. sapiens, Tr: T. rubripes, At: A. thaliana, Os: O. sativa, Sc: S. cerevisiae, Sp: S. pombe. Additional file 1, Table S2 shows corresponding matrices for other genome pairs.