Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Feb 17;31(7):877–888. doi: 10.1080/13803390802646973

TABLE 3.

Hierarchical regression analysis predicting GORT–IV fluency from RAN

RAN trial Predictor β ΔR2 p
Colors Age .068 .005 .693
Group −.026 .001 .884
Articulation Time −.298 .057 .171
Pause Time −.578 .243 .002
Articulation Variability .088 .007 .577
Pause Variability −.324 .085 .052
Numbers Age .070 .005 .679
Group −.005 .000 .978
Articulation Time −.535 .194 .008
Pause Timea −.382 .059 .121
Articulation Variabilitya −.008 .000 .962
Pause Variability −.222 .033 .247
Letters Age .070 .005 .679
Group −.005 .000 .978
Articulation Time −.337 .081 .097
Pause Timea −.551 .203 .005
Articulation Variabilitya .070 .004 .674
Pause Variability −.270 .049 .143

Note. Predicted variables entered in the following order: age, group, articulation time, pause time, articulation variability, and pause variability. RAN = rapid automatized naming; GORT–IV = Gray Oral Reading Test–Fourth Edition. Correlations in bold are p < .01.

a

Log transformation.