Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;51(1):74–84. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.74

Table 1.

Key studies of sexually transmitted infections interventions among young people in Europe, 1995-2005

Authors Setting and study sample Study design Comparison group Program implementers
1. Amirkhanian et al, 2003 (12)
Sofia, Bulgaria
St Petersburg, Russia
Intact social networks of young men having sex with men (MSM):
a. 6 in Sofia (n = 34)
b. 8 in St Petersburg (n = 48)
Mean age 24.4; 42% in school
Pre- and post-intervention risk assessment, ethnographic observations, sociometric measures, statistical analysis
Community-based outreach
No
Peers (trained social leaders of young MSM networks)
2. Bagnall and Lockerbie, 1996 (13)
Lothian region, Scotland
16- and 17-y-old boys and girls in 8 schools
Study: n = 747
Follow-up: n = 528
Pre- and post-intervention evaluation
School based
No
Specially trained sessional workers (young adults from outside)
3. Baraitser et al, 2002 (14)
South London, UK
Adventure playground for boys and girls
n = not defined (about 70 discussions)
Chiefly aged 13-16
Qualitative approach
Community-based outreach
No
Health professional (sexual health outreach nurse)
4. Borgia et al, 2005 (15)
Rome, Italy
18 high schools, students attending last two years
n = 1295 male and female
Age 16-23, median 18
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Social learning theory
School based
Schools were randomly assigned to a peer- or teacher-led program
54 peers (trained by psychologists)
27 teachers (trained by health care workers)
5. Borgia et al, 1997 (16)
Lazio region, Italy
46 junior and senior high schools
3866 students (male and female)
Intervention n = 2165
Control n = 1701
Median age: 15
RCT
School based
Schools were randomly divided into treatment and control groups
Teachers (trained by health workers)
6. Diez et al, 2000 (17)
Barcelona, Spain
17 secondary schools (academic or vocational)
n = 1215 (male and female)
Aged 15-17
Quasi-experimental study, pre- and post-intervention questionnaires
Health belief model; social cognitive theory; theory of planned behavior
School based
Intervention group: n = 220 students
Information group: n = 593
Control group: n = 402
Teachers (one training session)
7. Donati et al, 2000 (18)
Rome, Italy
5 public secondary schools
n = 376 (male and female)
Age 14–21
5 workshops
3 questionnaires
School based
No
Health specialists 
(1 gynecologist,
1 psychologist)
8. James et al, 1998 (19)
Nottingham, UK
Genitourinary medicine clinic patients
n = 492 (male and female)
Age 16+
RCT
Social learning theory
Clinic based
Intervention (individual counseling and skills training): n = 148
Control (written materials only): n = 162
Control (usual clinic procedure): n = 182
Health advisors (trained)
9. Kaldmäe et al, 2000 (20)
Estonia
a. 163 pupils, 53 teachers
b. 838 (male and female) pupils, 126 teachers or university students (student teachers)
c. 600 men in Estonian Defense Forces, average age 19
Background study
Interactive learning methods
2 school based projects
1 community-based outreach project
No
Teachers and peer educators
10. Kocken et al, 2001 (21)
Four largest cities in the Netherlands
Turkish and Moroccan migrant men in eg, coffee houses, mosques and bars
n = 589, groups averaged 23 men
Majority <30 years old
RCT
Community-based outreach
Intervention group:
n = 293
Control group:
n = 296
Peer educators (men from same ethnic group as participants)
11. Low et al, 2003 (22)
Inner London, UK
Further education colleges
n = 181 (male and female)
39% “black Africans”
43% “black Caribbeans” or “black other”
Age 16
Pilot study evaluation
Statistical analysis
School and community-based
No
Sexual health advisor (qualified nurse), with assistance from project manager
12. Magnusson et al, 2004 (23)
Hertfordshire, UK
Four mixed-sex schools
n = 589, follow-up n = 512
83% “white”
Age 13-14
Pilot non-randomized intervention study
Pre- and post-intervention questionnaire, evaluation questionnaire
School based
Intervention groups (given information at):
a. family planning clinic,
b. general practice,
c. school drop-in clinic
Control: usual school-based sex education
Health professionals (either family planner, general practitioner or a school nurse)
13. Martijn et al, 2004 (24)
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Refugee center
a. 75 new male and female migrants (Turkish, Moroccan, other Arabic); two thirds age 18-25
b. 36 Iraqi refugee men; two thirds age 20-30
Comparative study
Theory of planned behavior
Community-based outreach
a. no
b. refugees were assigned to groups led by either a lay health advisor (LHA) or professional health advisor (PHA)
a. 4 trained LHAs
b. 2 trained LHAs, 2 PHAs (public health nurses)
14. Oakeshott et al, 2000 (25)
South London, UK
28 general practices
n = 1382 women
Age 16-34
RCT (cluster randomized trial)
Clinic based
Intervention group:
14 general practices
Control group:
14 practices
Health professionals (nurses and general practitioners)
15. Rebull et al, 2003 (26)
Southern Tarragona, Spain
12 secondary schools (male and female)
n = 896 in pre-test, n = 805 in post-test
Age 14-17
Pre- and post-intervention study
School based
No
Teachers
16. Stephenson et al, 1998 (27)
Greater London, UK
4 schools
n = 469 (male and female)
Age 13-14
RCT
School based
2 intervention schools (peer-led sex education)
2 control schools (usual teacher-led sex education)
Peers (trained by experts)
17. Stephenson et al, 2004 (28)
Central and Southern England, UK
29 schools
n = 8000 (male and female)
Age 13-14 (at baseline)
RCT
School based
15 intervention schools (peer-led sex education)
14 control schools (usual teacher-led sex education)
Peers (trained by external team)
18. Tydén et al, 1998 (29)
Uppsala, Sweden
2 Swedish universities
n = 1600 (male and female)
Age 25 and younger
Quasi-experimental study, mass media campaign, peer education
School based
Intervention group: n = 600
Control group (no campaign): n = 400
Control group (post-intervention questionnaire only): n = 600
19 trained peer educators (first-year medicine and nursing students)
19. Wight et al, 2002 (30) Scotland, UK
25 secondary schools
n = 8430 (male and female)
Age 13-15 RCT (cluster randomized trial)
School based 13 intervention schools: Sexual Health and Relationships Program
12 control schools: existing sex education Teachers