TABLE 3.
Dependent on neither ALC nor MJ (ALC- MJ-) | Dependent on ALC but not MJ (ALC+ MJ-) | Dependent on MJ (MJ+) | Sig. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | n | Mean | SD | ||
Females, by Race | ||||||||||
White | 355 | −0.34 | 0.91 | 67 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 23 | 0.16 | 0.74 | 1 |
Black | 68 | −0.26 | 1.04 | 4 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0 | . | . | |
Asian | 48 | −0.25 | 1.14 | 4 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 1 | 0.50 | . | |
Other/Multiple | 48 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 8 | 0.27 | 0.70 | 2 | 0.49 | 0.61 | |
All Females | 519 | −0.29 | 0.96 | 83 | 0.14 | 0.77 | 26 | 0.20 | 0.71 | 1 |
Males, by Race | ||||||||||
White | 347 | 0.07 | 0.94 | 52 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 41 | 0.59 | 0.85 | 1 |
Black | 40 | −0.11 | 1.09 | 3 | 0.20 | 1.54 | 0 | . | . | |
Asian | 46 | 0.54 | 1.02 | 8 | 0.51 | 1.23 | 3 | 1.52 | 0.65 | |
Other/Multiple | 32 | 0.02 | 1.28 | 7 | 0.95 | 0.57 | 5 | 1.42 | 1.21 | 2 |
All Males | 465 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 70 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 49 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 1 |
Females and Males, by Race | ||||||||||
White | 702 | −0.14 | 0.95 | 119 | 0.43 | 0.88 | 64 | 0.44 | 0.83 | 1 |
Black | 108 | −0.21 | 1.06 | 7 | 0.16 | 0.94 | 0 | . | . | |
Asian | 94 | 0.13 | 1.15 | 12 | 0.44 | 1.06 | 4 | 1.26 | 0.73 | |
Other/Multiple | 80 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 15 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 7 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 2 |
All | 984 | −0.11 | 0.99 | 153 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 75 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 1 |
Note: The MJ+ category was defined without regard for ALC dependence; 27 individuals were dependent on both ALC and MJ.
Both the MJ+ group and the ALC+MJ- group are significantly different from the ALC-MJ- group (p<.05), but are not significantly different from each other.
The MJ+ group is significantly different from the ALC-MJ- group (p<.05).