Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 29;4:381–390. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3391

Table 4.

Summary of study methods and satisfaction outcomes of trials that compared Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) with another inhaler device using a validated assessment tool (Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire; PASAPQ) to assess satisfaction scores

Devices compared Disease Trial duration Number of patients Type of study and drug delivered Satisfaction outcome (mean total PASAPQ scores) Reference or company study code
Respimat® SMI vs HFA pMDI COPD and asthma 7 + 7 weeks 224 Crossover study, open-label; ipratropium + fenoterol Respimat® SMI, 83.7; pMDI, 72.9; mean difference, 10.8 (SD, 20.3); P < 0.001 Ref 27 Boehringer Ingelheim (215.1357)
Respimat® SMI vs DPI (Turbuhaler) Asthma 12 weeks 153 Post-clinical trial questionnaire, double-dummy design; budesonide or placebo Respimat® SMI, 85.5 (SD, 13.5) Turbuhaler®, 76.9 (16.3), mean difference, 8.6; P < 0.0001 for difference) Ref 48 Boehringer Ingelheim (1047.16)
Respimat® SMI vs DPI (Diskus) COPD and asthma 4 weeks 150 Observational study, open-label; ipratropium + fenoterol (Respimat® SMI); corticosteroid + LABA (Diskus®) Respimat® SMI, 80.2; Diskus®, 75.5; mean difference, 4.7; P = 0.001 Ref 49 Boehringer Ingelheim (215.1366)

Abbreviations: CFC, chlorofluorocarbon; DPI, dry powder inhaler; HFA, hydrofluoroalkane; LABA, long-acting beta-agonist; pMDI, pressurized metered dose inhaler; SD, standard deviation.