Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2009 Dec 21;121(1):63–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876383

Table 3.

Relationship Between the Number of Cardiac Rehabilitation Sessions Attended and Long-Term Outcomes by Subgroup

Indication and No. of Sessions Attended HR (95% CI)*
Mortality Myocardial Infarction
Indication, CABG
 36 sessions vs 24 sessions 0.99 (0.85–1.16) 0.90 (0.83–0.98)
 36 sessions vs 12 sessions 0.81 (0.71–0.92) 0.81 (0.69–0.96)
 36 sessions vs 1 session 0.61 (0.52–0.71) 0.74 (0.58–0.95)
Indication, Myocardial infarction
 36 sessions vs 24 sessions 0.66 (0.52–0.84) 0.89 (0.80–0.99)
 36 sessions vs 12 sessions 0.72 (0.59–0.88) 0.79 (0.64–0.97)
 36 sessions vs 1 session 0.46 (0.36–0.57) 0.71 (0.52–0.96)
Indication, Stable angina
 36 sessions vs 24 sessions 0.84 (0.62–1.15) 0.79 (0.69–0.91)
 36 sessions vs 12 sessions 0.88 (0.68–1.15) 0.63 (0.47–0.83)
 36 sessions vs 1 session 0.50 (0.38–0.66) 0.50 (0.33–0.76)
Heart failure
 36 sessions vs 24 sessions 0.88 (0.76–1.03) 0.91 (0.83–0.98)
 36 sessions vs 12 sessions 0.81 (0.71–0.92) 0.82 (0.70–0.97)
 36 sessions vs 1 session 0.54 (0.47–0.63) 0.75 (0.59–0.95)
Attended 6 or more sessions
 36 sessions vs 24 sessions 0.86 (0.76–0.97) 0.88 (0.82–0.95)
 36 sessions vs 12 sessions 0.75 (0.68–0.83) 0.78 (0.67–0.91)
 36 sessions vs 1 session

Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

*

Estimates from the mortality model are based on a nonlinear spline function; estimates from the myocardial infarction model are based on a linear function. Both models controlled for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and subsequent hospitalization.