Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med Technol. 2009 Aug 19;37(3):151–161. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.109.062729

TABLE 1.

Comparison of molecular imaging modalities

Modality Signal C R Sensitivity # Quantification Acq. Time (sec)
PET 11C, 18F, 64Cu, 68Ga Y Y 1 Very Good 10s–100s
SPECT 99mTc, 123I, 111In, 177Lu Y Y 10−1 - 10−2 Good 100s–1000s
Fluorescence Fluorescent proteins,
fluorochromes, quantum
dots
P Y 10−2 -1 * Poor to Fair* 1–10
BLI Luciferase N Y 1-102 * Poor to Fair* 1–10
MRI Gd, SPIO, USPIO, 19F P Y 10−5 Fair 100s–1000s
MRS Endogenous compounds,
hyperpolarized 13C
Y Y <10−5 Fair 100s–1000s
US microbubbles P Y ** Poor <1

C=Clinical, R=Preclinical (rodent), P=Potential;

#

Relative to PET;

*

Depth dependent;

**

Not well characterized