Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2008 Mar 20;111(1):40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.026

New episodes and new onsets of major depression in borderline and other personality disorders

John G Gunderson c,d,*, Robert L Stout f, Charles A Sanislow e, M Tracie Shea a, Thomas H McGlashan e, Mary C Zanarini c,d, Maria T Daversa c,d, Carlos M Grilo e, Shirley Yen a, Andrew E Skodol b
PMCID: PMC2829969  NIHMSID: NIHMS179811  PMID: 18358539

Abstract

Background

In the context of much literature and conjecture about the relationship of personality disorders (PD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), this paper uses longitudinal data to assess the frequency with which PD patients, and especially those with borderline personality disorder (BPD), have recurrences (for patients with lifetime histories), or new onsets (for patients without lifetime histories) of MDD.

Methods

A sample of 478 PD patients received reliable repeated follow-up assessments over a period of 6 years. The rates of new onsets and recurrences of MDD in all PD patients, and in BPD patients compared to OPD patients were analyzed. Whether age, gender, GAF score, or the number and types of BPD criteria predict new onsets or recurrences of MDD was also examined.

Results

Eighty-five percent of PD subjects had episodes of MDD during the 6 year follow-up; of those with lifetime MDD, 85% had recurrences. Of the PD subjects without lifetime MDD, 44% had new onsets. BPD subjects were significantly more likely (p=.0036) to have recurrences of MDD but were about equally likely to have new onsets compared to OPD subjects. The number and types of BPD criteria were predictive of onsets and recurrences for all PDs, but were not more predictive for the BPD than OPD subsamples.

Limitations

Longer term follow ups with a more epidemiologically representative sample of PDs would strengthen the generalizability of this study’s findings.

Conclusions

Having a comorbid PD confers significant risk for recurrences and for new onsets of MDD and confers a significantly negative effect on the course of MDD. BPD conferred more risk for recurrence than OPD.

Keywords: Personality disorders, Major depressive disorder, Longitudinal course


A considerable literature has grown about the interface between major depressive disorder (MDD) and personality disorders, much of which has focused on the interface with borderline personality disorder (BPD) (Rosenbluth et al., 2005; Mulder, 2002; Gunderson et al., 1999). Most of this literature has focused on rates of comorbidity and the effect of personality disorders on pathogenesis and treatment of MDD. To this literature, the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorder Study (CLPS) has added prospective longitudinal perspectives (Skodol et al., 1999; Shea et al., 2004; Gunderson et al., 2004; Grilo et al., 2005). A study based on the 2 year follow-up data showed some interaction between MDD and BPD, but not between MDD and other personality disorders (Shea et al., 2004). In that report, remissions of either MDD or BPD predicted improvements in the other, although this effect was stronger for BPD’s effect on MDD than vice versa. A subsequent study on BPD and MDD based on 3 year data and using more detailed and elaborated analyses, showed that the effects were more unidirectional; i.e., change (improvement or worsening) of BPD predicted change in MDD but reciprocal effects of MDD changes on BPD were not very evident (Gunderson et al., 2004). A third study using 2 year data showed that personality disorders significantly prolonged the time to remission for MDD (Grilo et al., 2005). That study confirmed the results from earlier work (Ilardi et al., 1997). In general, this literature shows that comorbid personality disorders can negatively affect the course of MDD and that improvements of MDD do not usually affect the course of personality disorders.

This report utilizes 6 year data from the CLPS to evaluate the relationship between personality disorders and MDD in a different way. This is the first study to prospectively examine whether having a comorbid PD, and particularly whether having BPD, confers risk for MDD episodes. To do this we examine the frequency with which personality disorder patients with or without lifetime MDD have recurrences or new onsets of MDD. We then compare whether the risk for the development of recurrences or new onsets is greater in BPD than in patients with other personality disorders (OPD). We also examine whether age, gender, GAF score, or the number or types of BPD criteria is predictive of recurrences or new onsets of MDD.

1. Methods

Detailed description of the CLPS projects design (Gunderson et al., 2000) and sample (McGlashan et al., 2000) have been reported previously. All patients signed informed consents. Relevant methods for the current report follow.

1.1. Sample

This study used available data up to 6 years of follow-up (6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 months) from 573 treatment-seeking patients with personality disorders. Because of their independent effects on the course of MDD, those patients with either bipolar I, bipolar II, or schizoaffective disorders (N =95) were excluded. The final sample of 478 personality disorder patients included 129 with BPD and 349 with other personality disorders (OPD). The follow-up sample that involved all subjects with at least 6 month follow-up data included 453 of the 478 (95%) subjects.

1.2. Assessments

All subjects were evaluated at baseline with the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV) (Zanarini et al., 1996) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) (First et al., 1996) by clinically experienced interviewers trained to pay particular attention to distinguishing Axis I mental state conditions from Axis II personality trait phenomena. The interrater reliability for MDD was kappa=0.80 with a test–retest kappa of 0.64 (Zanarini et al., 2000). For all personality disorder subjects, the interrater kappa ranged from 0.58–1.0. For BPD, the interrater and test–retest kappa were 0.68 and 0.69, respectively (Skodol et al., 2005).

Follow-along assessments of MDD were evaluated by Psychiatric Status Ratings (PSR) of the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (LIFE) (Keller et al., 1987) that records weekly variations in DSM IV major depressive criteria. New onsets of MDD were defined as a PSR of 5 or 6 for two or more successive months in patients without lifetime histories of MDD at baseline recruitment. Recurrences of MDD required the same 2 month algorithm for those personality disorder patients who had lifetime but not current MDD at baseline.

1.3. Analyses

Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to demonstrate rates of new onsets and of recurrences. In order to examine MDD recurrence without the confound of the variable duration of the baseline episode, the survival analyses excluded the 206 personality disorder subjects with MDD at baseline (whose variable duration of the baseline episodes would confound the analyses of recurrence). Cox time varying regression analyses were used to examine possible predictors of onsets or recurrences, i.e., age, gender, GAF score, and the total number or subtypes of the BPD criteria (using age, gender, and GAF score as covariates). As in prior CLPS predictor analyses (Gunderson et al., 2006), the three subtypes of criteria were grouped to reflect the affective (anger, affective instability), impulsive (impulsivity, self-harm) and interpersonal (intense unstable relationships, abandonment, emptiness) components of BPD.

2. Results

We had at least 6 month follow-up data on 95% (453) of the eligible personality disorder patients. The 25 subjects without follow-up data were similar to the remaining sample on age, gender, and both marital and employment status, but were slightly biased towards including more BPD (8.2% vs. 3.4% for OPD; p= 0.023).

We examined what proportion of our total personality disorder sample had or developed MDD episodes during the course of the study. Forty-three point one percent were in episode of MDD at baseline, 16.1% were without current/lifetime MDD, and 40.8% had prior lifetime MDD (but not current at baseline). Of the 16.1% who entered the study with no history of major depression, Kaplan–Meier survival analyses estimated that 44% experienced a new onset of MDD by year six. Multiplying 44% onset by 16.1% yields a total of 7.1% of new cases of major depression as a proportion of the total sample. Of the 40.8% who entered the study with a past history of major depression, lifetable analyses estimated that 85% experienced recurrences. This recurrence rate corresponded to another 34.7% of the total sample experiencing major depression. Summing across the three groups, the overall estimate for personality disorder patients having MDD episodes by year six was 84.9%. It should be noted that as we follow cases past year six the burden of depression can only increase as additional new onsets and recurrences continue to occur. Fig. 1 shows the breakdown of BPD and OPD samples. The main difference was that BPD had a higher percent of current MDD at baseline (chi square=18.572, df =1, p<.0001).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Total burden of major depression over 6 years of follow-up, by borderline PD vs. other PD.

As shown in Fig. 2, the subgroup of 61 BPD subjects with lifetime MDD were significantly more likely to have recurrences (92%), than were the 126 OPD subjects with prior lifetime MDD (82%) (Wilcoxon test for equality, p=0.0036). Fig. 3 shows that the 15 BPD patients without prior MDD, had a 41% rate of new onsets, which was not significantly different from the 45% rate of new onsets observed in the 57 OPD patients without lifetime MDD (Wilcoxon test for equality p=0.9683).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Recurrences of major depression in subjects having a history of depression but not in episode at intake, for borderline PD subjects vs. other PD subjects.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

New onsets of major depression in subjects with no history of depression at intake for borderline PD subjects vs. other PD subjects.

Examination of whether age, gender, GAF score, or the number and subtypes of BPD criteria predicted new onsets in the overall sample of all personality disorders without lifetime/current MDD yielded an effect for total number of BPD criteria predicting increased risk after covarying for age, gender, and GAF (hazard ratio [HR]= 1.249, chi square=7.528, df =1, p=.0061). In follow-up analyses we separately tested for effects of number of relational criteria, affective criteria, and impulsive criteria. Of these, only the affective criteria achieved statistical significance (chi square = 4.411, df = 1, p=0.0357). In the overall personality disorder sample with lifetime MDD (but not current at baseline), the number of BPD criteria was a strong predictor of recurrences (hazard ratio=1.252, p<.0001), as were each of the subtypes of the BPD criteria, i.e., for affective criteria the HR=1.638, p<.0001; for impulsive criteria the HR=1.751, p=.0005, and for relational criteria the HR=1.689, p<.0001. There was no evidence that age, gender, baseline GAF, or either the number or subtypes of BPD criteria were more predictive of onsets or of recurrences in BPD subjects than in OPD subjects.

3. Discussion

The 84.9% of the overall personality disorder sample who had episodes of MDD during the 6 year follow-up indicates that having a personality disorder confers very high risk for MDD. As expected, the rate of recurrences was much higher than the rate of new onsets. Of further note was that 44% of the personality disorder patients without prior MDD had new onsets.

For the personality disorder subjects with lifetime (but not current) MDD, the rate of recurrences was 85%. The comparable sample with lifetime (but not current) MDD from the Collaborative Depression Study had a 67% rate of recurrence over 5 years (Keller et al., 1992) — some of which may have been predisposed to by comorbid PD. Thus the 85% rate found in this study indicates that personality disorders add considerable risk. Together with the prior reports that personality disorders greatly prolong the duration of MDD episodes (Grilo et al., 2005; Ilardi et al., 1997), this study prospectively demonstrated that comorbid personality disorders add clinically significant morbidity for patients with MDD in the form of recurrences, especially for BPD, and for new onsets, especially for OPD.

These findings may be attributed to the predisposing effects of having less adaptive behaviors, more interpersonal handicaps, more cognitive deficits, and the greater subjective distress that characterize personality disorders. With regard to specificity, it is notable that we elsewhere found that comorbid personality disorder does not significantly affect the course of eating disorders (Grilo et al., 2007). Requiring further study is whether having any personality disorder or only specific types conveys this added risk for more frequent or longer episodes of other axis I disorders, such as substance abuse or anxiety disorders. Nonetheless, our results suggest that personality disorders share underlying pathologies with depression.

BPD patients with prior MDD were significantly more apt to have recurrences than were the OPD patients with prior MDD. This may be because patients with BPD are generally more severely dysfunctional than patients with OPDs (Skodol et al., 2002) and because they tend to have more frequent negative life stressors (Lovev and Jackson, 2006; Pagano et al., 2004). It is consistent with our finding that BPD slows the time to remission and increases the likelihood of relapses of MDD more that OPD (Gunderson et al., 2004). It is also consistent with clinical theories in which the interpersonal neediness and fearfulness of borderline patients predisposes to the onsets and recurrence of their depressions (Gunderson, 2001; Young et al., 2003). On the other hand, BPD patients without prior MDD did not appear to be more apt to have new onsets.

The analyses of predictors revealed that the number and the types of BPD criteria increased the risk of recurrence of MDD in the overall personality disorder sample. But they did not predict vulnerability for new onsets nor did they have more predictive strength in BPD subjects than in OPDs. However, these analyses were limited by the size of the BPD sample, especially those with new onsets. And, although we know that the BPD sample received more antidepressant medications than the OPDs (Bender et al., 2006), our naturalistic study design does not allow us to determine whether their use, types or dosages affected the rates. Moreover, level of treatment utilization is often a proxy for severity.

As shown in this study, the very significant effect that comorbid personality disorders have on the course of MDD indicate that future studies of the course or treatment of MDD should assess for their presence and type. Future studies may also address personality characteristics that predispose to MDD by examining criteria counts, cognitive schema, or interpersonal style. While all personality disorders add sufficient morbidity, this may be particularly true for BPD and BPD-related psychopathology. Understanding the mechanism of these effects could help to clarify unexplained treatment resistance in MDD (Dunner et al., 2006).

Acknowledgments

Role of funding source

The role of funding source is listed on the cover page.

Footnotes

This work was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Award sites include Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (MH50837) (Shea, Stout, Yen) and MH069904 (Dr. Yen), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute (MH50839) (Dr. Skodol), Harvard Medical School and McLean Hospital (MH50840) (Gunderson, Zanarini, Daversa), Texas A&M University (MH50838) (Morey), Yale University School of Medicine (MH50850) (McGlashan, Grilo, Sanislow) and MH01654 (Dr. McGlashan, Grilo, and Sanislow) and MH073708 (Dr. Sanislow). Principal Investigators are John G. Gunderson, Thomas H. McGlashan, Leslie C. Morey, M. Tracie Shea, and Andrew E. Skodol. This manuscript has been reviewed and approved by the Publications Committee of the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Dr. Stout is affiliated with Decision Sciences Institute (PIRE).

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

References

  1. Bender DS, Skodol AE, Pagano ME, Dyck IR, Grilo CM, Shea MT, Sanislow CA, Zanarini MC, Yen S, McGlashan TH, Gunderson JG. Prospective assessment of treatment use by patients with personality disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:254–257. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dunner DI, Rush J, Russell JM, Burke M, Woodard S, Wingard P, Allen J. Prospective, long-term, multicenter study of the naturalistic outcomes of patients with treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:688–695. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, William JBW. Structured Clinical Interview For DSM-IV Axis I Disorders: Patient Version (SCID-I/P) Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; New York, NY: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  4. Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, Shea MT, Skodol AE, Stout RL, Gunderson JG, Yen S, Bender DS, Pagano ME, Zanarini MC, Morey LC, McGlashan TH. Two-year prospective naturalistic study of remission from major depressive disorder as a function of personality disorder comorbidity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:78–85. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grilo CM, Pagano ME, Skodol AE, Sanislow CA, McGlashan TH, Gunderson JG, Stout RL. Natural course of bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified: 5-year prospective study of remissions, relapses, and the effects of personality disorder psychopathology. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:738–746. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunderson JG. Borderline Personality Disorder: A Clinical Guide. American Psychiatric Press, Inc; Washington, DC: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gunderson JG, Triebwasser J, Phillips KA. Personality and vulnerability to affective disorders. In: Cloninger CR, editor. Personality and Psychopathology. Am Psych Press, Inc; Washington, DC: 1999. pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gunderson JG, Shea MT, Skodol AE, McGlashen TH, Morey LC, Stout RI, Zanarini MC, Grilo CM, Oldham JM, Keller MB. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study I: development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. J Pers Disord. 2000;14:300–315. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunderson JG, Morey LC, Stout RL, Skodol AE, Shea MT, McGlashan TH, Zanarini MC, Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, Yen S, Daversa MT, Bender DS. Major deprerssive disorder and borderline personality disorder revisited: longitudinal interactions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:1049–1056. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gunderson JG, Daversa MT, Grilo CM, McGlashan TH, Zanarini MC, Shea MT, Skodol AE, Yen S, Sanislow CA, Bender DS, Dyck I, Morey L, Stout RL. Predictors of 2-year outcome for patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:822–826. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ilardi SS, Craighead WC, Evans DD. Modeling relapse in unipolar depression: the effects of dysfunctional cognitions and personality disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65:381–391. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.3.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Friedman B, Nielson E, Endicott J, McDonald-Scott P, Andreason NC. The longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:540–548. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180050009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Mueller TI, Endicott J, Corywell W, Hirschfeld RM, Shea T. Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. a 5-year prospective follow-up of 431 subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:809–816. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100053010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lovev M, Jackson HJ. The relationship of borderline personality disorder, life events, and functioning in an Australian psychiatric sample. J Pers Disord. 2006;20:205–217. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.3.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, Morey LC, Zanarini MC, Stout RI. The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: baseline axis I/II and II/II diagnostic co-occurrence. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;102:256–264. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.102004256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mulder RT. Personality pathology and treatment outcome in major depression: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:359–371. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pagano ME, Skodol AE, Stout RL, Shea MT, Yen S, Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, Bender DS, McGlashan TH, Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG. Stressful life events as predictors of functioning: findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;110:421–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00398.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenbluth M, Kennedy SH, Bagby RM. Depression and Personality: Conceptual and Clinical Challenges. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; Washington, DC: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shea MT, Stout RL, Yen S, Pagano ME, Skodol AE, Morey LC, Gunderson JG, McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Sanislow CA, Bender DS, Zanarini MC. Associations in the course of personality disorders and axis I disorders over time. J Abnorm Psychology. 2004;113:499–508. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.113.4.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Skodol AE, Stout RL, McGlashan TH, Grilo CM, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, Morey LC, Zanarini MC, Dyck IR, Oldham JM. Co-occurrence of mood and personality disorders: a report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS) Depress Anxiety. 1999;10:175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, McGlashan TH, Dyck IR, Stout RL, Bender DS, Grilo CM, Shea MT, Zanarini MC, Morey LC, Sanislow CA, Oldham JM. Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive–compulsive personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:276–283. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Shea MT, McGlashan TH, Morey LC, Sanislow CA, Bender DS, Grilo CM, Zanarini MC, Yen S, Pagano ME, Stout RI. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS): overview and implications. J Pers Disord. 2005;19:487–504. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.5.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Young JE, Klosko J, Weishaar ME. Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide. Guilford Press; NY: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Sickel AE, Yong L. The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV) McLean Hospital; Belmont, MA: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender D, Dolan R, Sanislow CA, Morey LC, Grilo CM, Shea MT, McGlashan TH, Gunderson JG. The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: II. Reliability of axis I and axis II diagnosis. J Pers Disord. 2000;14:291–299. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES