Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2007 Aug;69:130–137. doi: 10.1080/14034950701355429

Table II.

Distribution of household types nationally and in the Agincourt DSS,a South Africa.

National data sets
Agincourt DSS
1995
OHSb
1999
OHSb
2003
GHS
Actual
Projected
Type of household Rurald Rural Rural 1996 1999 2003 Long run 1e Long run 2f
Single person 0.108 0.160 0.203 0.057 0.062 0.051 0.052 0.053
Couple 0.058 0.053 0.053 0.021 0.024 0.020 0.020 0.021
Nuclear 0.302 0.181 0.146 0.255 0.240 0.221 0.204 0.206
Single parent 0.146 0.140 0.130 0.103 0.110 0.115 0.109 0.110
Three-generation linear 0.174 0.178 0.177 0.189 0.204 0.216 0.230 0.231
Three-generation skip 0.032 0.054 0.062 0.024 0.031 0.039 0.041 0.041
Multi-generation 0.017 0.005 0.003 0.043 0.043 0.064 0.058 0.058
Siblings only 0.014 0.022 0.027 0.006 0.009 0.009 na na
Complex, related 0.136 0.186 0.181 0.256 0.266 0.253 0.275 0.274
Complex plus unrelated 0.015 0.021 0.019 0.009 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.006
Don't know 0.037 0.006 0.005 0.005
n 12,858 10,951 11,174 11,764 12,518 12,596
a

The table contains column proportions. Estimates from the national data sets are weighted according to the official weights supplied by Statistics South Africa.

b

October Household Survey.

c

General Household Survey.

d

Includes the ‘Other-rural’ and ‘Tribal area’ sub-samples.

e

‘Long run 1’ gives the distribution of household types if household transition probabilities (see Table IV) are continuously reapplied until a steady state is reached.

f

‘Long run 2’ is obtained in the same way as the ‘long run 1’ distribution, except the ‘Don't know’ category is amalgamated with the ‘Complex, unknown’ category (see methods section).