Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 12;365(1543):1111–1126. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0285

Table 3.

Directions of the strongest selection on beak morphology during first 19 generations following population establishment in northwestern Montana, USA. Shown are eigenvalues (λi) and eigenvectors (mi) of the M matrix from the canonical rotation of γ (table 2) and the direction of the strongest natural selection (a1) estimated by the projection pursuit regression. Additional directions were not significantly different.

generations
5
6
7
8
λi BL BD BW λi BL BD BW λi BL BD BW λi BL BD BW
m1 0.06 −0.32 0.54 −0.16 0.05 −0.41 0.89 −0.17 0.06 0.86 −0.32 0.40 0.07 0.41 0.86 0.31
m2 0.01 0.67 0.31 −0.47 0.01 0.69 0.42 0.58 0.01 −0.09 0.67 0.73 −0.03 −0.73 0.32 0.65
m3 −0.03 0.12 0.41 0.31 −0.02 −0.59 −0.12 0.80 −0.02 0.51 0.66 −0.55 0.01 −0.12 0.31 0.21
a1 0.11 0.18 0.77 0.36 0.19 0.56 0.48 −0.14 0.58 0.39 0.01 0.59
9 10 11 12
m1 0 0.53 0.67 0.52 0.02 0.54 0.15 0.83 0 0.53 0.02 0.85 0.02 0.92 0.39 −0.09
m2 −0.03 0.84 −0.29 −0.47 0 0.46 0.78 −0.44 −0.01 0.20 0.97 −0.15 0 0.13 −0.08 0.99
m3 −0.09 0.16 −0.68 0.71 −0.07 −0.71 0.61 0.36 −0.07 0.82 −0.25 −0.51 −0.03 −0.37 0.92 0.12
a1 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.52 0.82 0.11 0.39 0.23 0.87 0.53 0.21 0.42
13 14 15 16
m1 0.02 0.08 0.84 −0.53 0.06 −0.65 0.05 0.76 0.03 −0.17 0.96 −0.21 0.07 0.60 0.27 0.75
m2 −0.01 0.36 0.46 0.81 0.01 0.28 0.94 0.19 0 −0.32 0.14 0.94 −0.01 0.75 0.65 0.14
m3 −0.03 0.93 −0.25 −0.26 −0.06 0.70 −0.33 0.63 −0.05 0.93 0.23 0.28 −0.06 −0.28 0.87 0.12
a1 0.63 0.11 0.54 −0.15 0.03 0.47 0.25 0.24 0.71 0.16 0.37 0.65
17 18 overall
m1 0.01 0.52 0.01 0.84 0.01 0.79 0 −0.61 0.01 0.18 0.98 0.01
m2 −0.01 0.17 0.84 −0.14 0 0.22 0.27 0.94 0 0.69 −0.13 0.71
m3 −0.06 0.76 −0.24 −0.49 −0.02 0.27 0.74 −0.35 −0.01 −0.70 0.11 0.70
a1 0.49 0.07 0.67 0.54 −0.16 0.58 0.57 0.19 0.45

Bold a1 values are significant at α < 0.05 and s.e. is determined by 500 bootstraps.