Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;127(2):1059–1068. doi: 10.1121/1.3278606

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of compensation between Experiments 1 and 2. The compensations for perturbations of equivalent magnitude were compared directly. However, in Experiment 2, the F1 perturbation was incremented by 4 Hz per utterance. Thus, there was no utterance for which the perturbation of F1 was 50 Hz (as used in Experiment 1). A compensation response to a 50 Hz perturbation for F1 was approximated by averaging the compensations for perturbations of 48 and 52 Hz from the Experiment 2.