Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 2;7(3):e1000224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000224

Table 1. Acute interventions and secondary prevention strategies of proven benefit based on level I evidence.

Category Evidence Level Intervention Initial or Important Study, Year [Reference] RRR ARR NNT1
Acute stroke Proven Stroke unit Langhorne et al., 1993 [10] 6.5% 3.8% 26
Thrombolysis (tPA) NINDS, 1995[58] 9.8% 5.5% 18
Aspirin IST, 1997[59] 2.6% 1·2% 83
Decompression surgery for IS Vahedi et al., 2007 [9] 48.8% 23% 4a
Under evaluation Recombinant factor 7 for ICH Mayer et al., 2005[60]
Surgery for ICH Mendelow et al., 2005[61]
Extending time window for thrombolysis DIAS, 2005[62]
Sonothrombolysis Alexandrov et al., 2004[63]
Thrombectomy MERCI, 2005[32]
Blood pressure lowering ENOS, 2007[64]
Neuroprotection SAINT, 2006[65]
Secondary prevention Proven Aspirin Canadian Co-op Study Group[66] 13.0% 1.0% 100
Aspirin plus dipyridamole Diener, 1996[67] 15.0% 1.9% 53
Clopidogrel CAPRIE, 1996[68] 10.0% 1.6% 62
Anticoagulants EAFT, 1993[69] 66.0% 8.0% 11
Carotid endarterectomy NASCET, 1991[70]; ECST, 1991[71] 44.0% 3.8% 26
Blood pressure lowering PROGRESS, 2001[72] 28.0% 4.0% 97b
Cholesterol lowering SPARCL, 2006[73] 16.0% 2.2% 220b
Under evaluation Angioplasty Yadav et al, 2004[74]
Thrombin inhibitors RELY, 2009 [14]

The number needed to treat (NNT1) to prevent one stroke patient dying or becoming dependent (acute stroke), or to prevent one fatal or non-fatal stroke (secondary prevention), per year, are given. All figures are approximate and derived from previous analyses, the Cochrane database, or individual trials if these are the only data available. Modified from Donnan et al. [2],

a

NNT for survival with mRS≤3.

b

Calculations based on mean follow-up of 3.9 y in PROGRESS (NNT3.9 = 25) and median 4.9 y in SPARCL (NNT4.9 = 45).

ARR, absolute risk reduction; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; IS, ischaemic stroke; NNT, number needed to treat; RRR, relative risk reduction.