Table 2. Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis Predicting to Popular Group Status.
| A. Gain group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | Wald (df) | B | SE | Odds ratio (eb) | 95% CI |
| Sex | 2.88 (1) | −0.31 | 0.18 | 0.74 | (0.51, 1.05) |
| Prosocial residual | 0.20 (1) | 0.07 | 0.15 | 1.07 | (0.80, 1.45) |
| Leadership residual | 1.13 (1) | −0.17 | 0.16 | 0.84 | (0.61, 1.16) |
| Arrogant residual | 0.80 (1) | −0.21 | 0.24 | 0.81 | (0.51, 1.29) |
| Aggression residual | 0.86 (1) | −0.20 | 0.21 | 0.86 | (0.54, 1.25) |
| Aggression x Prosocial | 1.01 (1) | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.22 | (0.83, 1.81) |
| Aggression x Arrogant | 0.02 (1) | 0.02 | 0.10 | 1.02 | (0.84, 1.23) |
| Arrogant x Sex | 1.83 (1) | 0.35 | 0.26 | 1.41 | (0.86, 2.33) |
| B. Loss group | |||||
| Sex | 18.86 (1) ** | −1.19 | 0.28 | 0.30 | (0.18, 0.52) |
| Prosocial residual | 0.64 (1) | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.85 | (0.56, 1.28) |
| Leadership residual | 12.40 (1) ** | −0.86 | 0.24 | 0.43 | (0.26, 0.68) |
| Arrogant residual | 10.28 (1) ** | −1.36 | 0.43 | 0.26 | (0.11, 0.59) |
| Aggression residual | 8.02 (1) ** | −0.99 | 0.35 | 0.37 | (0.19, 0.74) |
| Aggression x Prosocial | 5.93 (1) * | 0.88 | 0.36 | 2.41 | (1.19, 4.89) |
| Aggression x Arrogant | 5.15 (1) * | −0.87 | 0.38 | 0.42 | (0.20, 0.88) |
| Arrogant x Sex | 12.13 (1) ** | 1.92 | 0.55 | 6.79 | (2.31,19.93) |
Note. Odds ratio refers to the stable group as the reference group
*
p < .05.
**
p < .001.