Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 16;19(6):1129–1136. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp561

Table 2.

The results of power calculation for using the additive model instead of correct dominant model where sample size (n = 17 374), effect size (β = −0.082) and MAF (0.39) the same as the LCT variant had in combined Finnish sample of this study

Significance level Power (%)
Dominant model Additive model
0.05 98 83
0.01 91 63
0.001 73 35
1 × 10−4 51 16
1 × 10−5 30 7
1 × 10−6 16 2
1 × 10−7 8 1
5 × 10−8 6 1