Table 2.
The results of power calculation for using the additive model instead of correct dominant model where sample size (n = 17 374), effect size (β = −0.082) and MAF (0.39) the same as the LCT variant had in combined Finnish sample of this study
Significance level | Power (%) |
|
---|---|---|
Dominant model | Additive model | |
0.05 | 98 | 83 |
0.01 | 91 | 63 |
0.001 | 73 | 35 |
1 × 10−4 | 51 | 16 |
1 × 10−5 | 30 | 7 |
1 × 10−6 | 16 | 2 |
1 × 10−7 | 8 | 1 |
5 × 10−8 | 6 | 1 |