Table 2.
Cut-off analysis
| Cut-off | Sensitivity (%) |
Specificity (%) |
PPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOMA-IR | |||
| 2.0 | 71.6 | 45.6 | 63.1 |
| 3.0 | 56.7 | 59.6 | 64.6 |
| 4.0 | 45.9 | 73.7 | 69.4 |
| 5.0 | 32.4 | 84.2 | 72.7 |
| 5.5 | 29.7 | 89.5 | 78.6 |
| 6.0 | 25.7 | 92.9 | 82.6 |
| 7.0 | 20.2 | 92.9 | 78.9 |
| TG/HDLc | |||
| 2.0 | 85.1 | 24.1 | 58.8 |
| 3.0 | 59.4 | 53.4 | 62.0 |
| 4.0 | 47.3 | 68.9 | 66.0 |
| 5.0 | 32.4 | 81.0 | 68.6 |
| 6.0 | 20.2 | 86.2 | 65.2 |
| 7.0 | 16.2 | 93.0 | 75.0 |
| 8.0 | 16.2 | 94.8 | 80.0 |
| 8,5 | 16.2 | 96.5 | 85.7 |
| HOMA-IR × TG/HDLc | |||
| 4 (p25) | 80.8 | 29.8 | 59.6 |
| 10 (p50) | 57.5 | 59.6 | 64.6 |
| 24 (p75) | 34.2 | 85.9 | 75.7 |
| 28 (p80) | 30.1 | 94.7 | 88.0 |
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), for different cut-off values of homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR), Triglyceride/HDLc index (TG/HDLc) and the product [HOMA-IR×TG/HDLc].