Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 10;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-13

Table 3.

Items and factor loadings in the original abstinence-oriented scale

Original abstinence-oriented items Original
factor
loadings
OMT staff Harm reduction staff

Factor loadings Squared multiple correlations† Factor loadings Squared multiple correlations†
Confrontation is necessary in the treatment of drug addicts 0.53 0.358 0.128 0.556 0.309

Left to themselves, most methadone patients would stay in maintenance for life 0.60 0.007 < 0.001 0.013 < 0.001

OMT services should be expanded so all narcotic addicts who want OMT can receive it 0.62 0.238 0.057 0.246 0.061

Abstinence from all opioids (including methadone) should be the principal goal of maintenance treatment 0.60 0.516 0.266 0.531 0.282

Methadone maintenance patients who continue to use illicit opiates should have their dose of methadone reduced 0.77 0.699 0.489 0.457 0.209

No limits should be set on the duration of methadone maintenance 0.64 0.260 0.067 0.514 0.265

Methadone should be gradually withdrawn once a maintenance patient has ceased using illicit opiates 0.62 0.193 0.037 0.558 0.311

It is unethical to deny a narcotic addict OMT 0.54 0.284 0.080 0.334 0.112

OMT patients who ignore repeated warnings to stop using illicit opiates should be gradually withdrawn off methadone 0.76 0.659 0.434 0.594 0.353

Maintenance patients should only be given enough methadone to prevent the onset of withdrawals 0.59 0.115 0.013 0.248 0.062

The clinician should encourage patients to remain in methadone maintenance for at least three to four years 0.51 0.036 0.001 -0.123 0.015

It is unethical to maintain addicts on methadone indefinitely 0.58 0.354 0.126 0.385 0.148

OMT patients who continue to abuse non-opioid drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines) should have their dose of OMT medication reduced. 0.60 0.602 0.363 0.530 0.281

The clinician's principal role is to prepare methadone maintenance patients for drug-free living 0.56 0.526 0.277 0.464 0.216

Items in italics omitted from exploratory analysis of a new attitudinal scale

† The extent that the variance of the measured variable is explained by the latent factor.