Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2009 Sep 1;81(17):7235–7242. doi: 10.1021/ac900855f

Table 1.

Percent oxidations after cold chemical oxidation of apomyoglobin. The %'s were calculated from the ratio of the signal for the modified peptide divided by that for the unmodified peptide; the apomyoglobin was incubated for 2 h with 100 mM H2O2 at −80 or −15 °C. The water exposure and % oxidized were calculated as described in the experimental section.

Residue Type % Ox (−80 °C) %Ox (−15 °C) Protein Water Exposure (Å2)
Trp-7 3% 2% 19
Trp-14 Ya Ya 7
Tyr-103 0.2% 0.2% 28
Tyr-146 6% 6% 18
Met-55 Y Y 16
Met-131 56% 82% 0
Phe-33 ndb ndb 6
Phe-106 0.01% 0.01% 36
Phe-123 Y Y 9
Phe-138 2% 2% 30
Phe-151 Y Y 38
His-24 1% 0.8% 12
His-36 0.9% 0.8% 29
His-64 Y Y 28
His-81 xc xc 64
His-82 x x 9
His-93 x x 37
His-97 x x 38
His-113 Y Y 48
His-116 0.03% 0.1% 47
His-119 0.2% 0.7% 24
Val-10 nd nd 0
Val-13 nd nd 8
Val-17 0.5% 0.2% 0
Val-28 nd nd 0
Val-67 nd nd 112
Val-68 0.2% 0.3% 44
Val-114 nd nd 10
a

Y annotation indicates that the oxidized peptide was detected but could not be quantified owing to interference and/or poor chromatographic resolution.

b

The nd annotation indicates that the modified peptide was not detectable although the unmodified peptide was. The detection limits were in all cases better than 1% and for 80% of the detections, the detection limits were 0.2% or better. Detection limits are variable owing to differences in the ionization efficiencies of the tryptic peptides.

c

The x annotation indicates that the unmodified peptide carrying the denoted residue was not observed (was not retained on the reverse phase column); therefore, no conclusion regarding the reactive residue can be drawn.