Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14506–14510. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-09.2009

Table 1.

Mean RTs and error rates in the empirical data (upper rows) and simulated data (lower rows)

RT (cycles) RT (ms) Error (%)
Empirical
    Congruent 427 (12) 8.1 (0.7)
    Incongruent 452 (13) 15.8 (0.9)
Simulation
    Congruent 9.7 (0.22) 427 (5) 7.9 (0.8)
    Incongruent 10.8 (0.22) 452 (5) 16.6 (1.1)

SEs are given in parentheses. —, No RT (cycle) value for the empirical data.