Table 2.
Generalized estimating equation analyses of self-reported abstinence and toxicology-verified abstinence for 85 veterans assigned to a money manager or to a control interventiona
Abstinence (%) |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control (N=41) |
Money manager (N=44) |
Group |
Week |
Group × week |
||||||||||
Outcome | M | SD | M | SD | Estimate | z | p | Estimate | z | p | Estimate | z | p | Nb |
Primary | ||||||||||||||
Self-reported abstinence from alcohol and cocaine | 86 | 35 | 88 | 32 | −.34 | −.63 | ns | −.03 | −1.56 | ns | .01 | .38 | ns | 2,032 |
Negative toxicology for cocaine | 88 | 32 | 92 | 28 | .20 | .36 | ns | −.03 | −3.69 | <.001 | −.02 | −1.00 | ns | 871 |
Secondary | ||||||||||||||
Self-reported abstinence from alcohol | 88 | 32 | 88 | 32 | −.06 | −.12 | ns | −.03 | −1.61 | ns | .02 | .79 | ns | 2,034 |
Self-reported abstinence from cocaine | 95 | 22 | 98 | 15 | −.15 | −.17 | ns | −.002 | −.05 | ns | −.05 | −1.05 | ns | 2,032 |
Higher (more positive) group coefficients of abstinence measures indicate higher proportions abstinent in the control group.
Number of observations used in the analysis